Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-17 Thread Guido Guenther
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: [..snip..] /usr/bin/nm __udivdi3 /usr/bin/nm __umoddi3 /usr/bin/strip __ucmpdi2 /usr/bin/strip __udivdi3 I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you mean... You mean that a binary has _udivdi3 or __umoddi3 and then

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Hi Guido, Thanks for your explanation. At Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:32:42 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it might not be correct: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:44AM +0900,

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-17 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:12:11 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Hi Guido, Thanks for your explanation. At Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:32:42 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-16 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0800, Ryan Murray wrote: [1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)] On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:10:59AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:14 -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-16 Thread Guido Guenther
Hi Gotom, I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it might not be correct: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:44AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: 1. Why is __fixunsdfdi appeared, on the contrary why is not __fixdfdi appeared gcc does the double - signed long long conversion inline

Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 179781 glibc Bug#179781: dcgui: relocation error: /usr/bin/dcgui: undefined symbol: __fixunsdfdi Bug#180330: libc6, relocation error (dcgui) Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `glibc'. severity 179781 serious Bug#179781: dcgui:

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-13 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:14 -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 179781 glibc Bug#179781: dcgui: relocation error: /usr/bin/dcgui: undefined symbol: __fixunsdfdi Bug#180330: libc6, relocation error (dcgui) Bug reassigned from package

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-13 Thread Guido Guenther
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:10:59AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Another question is: which symbols should we add for i386 libgcc-compat? __cmpdi2 __divdi3 __fixunsdfdi __fixunssfdi __fixunsxfdi __moddi3 __ucmpdi2 __udivdi3 __umoddi3 These showed up by first looking at which symbols libgcc_s.so