On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
[..snip..]
/usr/bin/nm __udivdi3
/usr/bin/nm __umoddi3
/usr/bin/strip __ucmpdi2
/usr/bin/strip __udivdi3
I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you mean... You mean that a binary
has _udivdi3 or __umoddi3 and then
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Hi Guido,
Thanks for your explanation.
At Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:32:42 +0100,
Guido Guenther wrote:
I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it might not be
correct:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:44AM +0900,
At Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:12:11 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Hi Guido,
Thanks for your explanation.
At Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:32:42 +0100,
Guido Guenther wrote:
I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it
At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0800,
Ryan Murray wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:10:59AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:14 -0600,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Gotom,
I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it might not be
correct:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:44AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
1. Why is __fixunsdfdi appeared, on the contrary why is not __fixdfdi
appeared
gcc does the double - signed long long conversion inline
At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:14 -0600,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 179781 glibc
Bug#179781: dcgui: relocation error: /usr/bin/dcgui: undefined symbol: __fixunsdfdi
Bug#180330: libc6, relocation error (dcgui)
Bug reassigned from package
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:10:59AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Another question is: which symbols should we add for i386 libgcc-compat?
__cmpdi2
__divdi3
__fixunsdfdi
__fixunssfdi
__fixunsxfdi
__moddi3
__ucmpdi2
__udivdi3
__umoddi3
These showed up by first looking at which symbols libgcc_s.so
7 matches
Mail list logo