Re: glibc 2.3.5-12.1 screwed up on Alpha

2006-02-06 Thread Denis Barbier
[Daniel Jacobowitz] On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:42:05PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: $ ar p nscd_2.3.5-12.1_alpha.deb control.tar.gz | tar zxf - -O ./control [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-12.1) It should depend on libc6.1, like previous versions. Does someone understand what happened? I

Re: glibc 2.3.5-12.1 screwed up on Alpha

2006-02-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:13:15AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: In fact this is a timestamp problem, debian/control has not been generated on Alpha because it appears after its dependant targets in glibc_2.3.5-12.1.diff.gz. I am afraid that a new upload is needed to fix this mess. Adding a

Re: glibc 2.3.5-12.1 screwed up on Alpha

2006-02-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:42:05PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: $ ar p nscd_2.3.5-12.1_alpha.deb control.tar.gz | tar zxf - -O ./control [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-12.1) It should depend on libc6.1, like previous versions. Does someone understand what happened? I would check the

Re: glibc 2.3.5-12.1 screwed up on Alpha

2006-02-05 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:46:41PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:42:05PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: $ ar p nscd_2.3.5-12.1_alpha.deb control.tar.gz | tar zxf - -O ./control [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-12.1) It should depend on libc6.1, like