Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-12-18 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same as

Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-12-18 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same as

Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-12-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Richard Zidlicky writes: On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s).

Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-10-29 Thread Yann Dirson
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself. Madkiss

Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-10-29 Thread Yann Dirson
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself. Madkiss

Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-10-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself. Madkiss suggested forcing the use of gcc-3.2. But if this compiler is

Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?

2002-10-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Yann Dirson writes: I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself. Madkiss suggested forcing the use of gcc-3.2. But if this compiler is