On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:15:36PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:26:10PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
If you want to change glibc at this point, discuss with Carlos; I can't
take care of it. Just getting -22 built has taken most of my free time
for this week.
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:52:58PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:15:36PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:26:10PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
If you want to change glibc at this point, discuss with Carlos; I can't
take care of it. Just
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:26:10PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
If you want to change glibc at this point, discuss with Carlos; I can't
take care of it. Just getting -22 built has taken most of my free time
for this week.
Carlos? This seems like your fault, how do *you* want to fix it?
Hi debian-hppa (and -admin),
I tried building glibc manually on paer. It didn't work any better.
It turns out that ex1 hanging was not the first problem in the build;
make crashes building math/others. That's transient, though, and
rerunning make got me a build. After much poking at it I am
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
27319 mmap(NULL, 1073741824, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0 unfinished ...
27319 ... mmap resumed ) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
Right now I don't think we could even
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:38:33PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
27319 mmap(NULL, 1073741824, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0 unfinished ...
27319 ... mmap resumed ) = -1 ENOMEM
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Hi debian-hppa (and -admin),
I tried building glibc manually on paer. It didn't work any better.
It turns out that ex1 hanging was not the first problem in the build;
make crashes building math/others. That's transient,
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:21:48PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:38:33PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
27319 mmap(NULL, 1073741824, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:45:35PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:21:48PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:38:33PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
27319 mmap(NULL,
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:10:49PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:45:35PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:21:48PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:38:33PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:32:53PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Well, how can we fix this for sarge then? Either we need to change glibc
or the kernel, both of which are extremely deeply frozen. I'd rather
fix this by reverting to our previous behaviour of assuming 8MB stacks
for threads
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:55:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:32:53PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Well, how can we fix this for sarge then? Either we need to change glibc
or the kernel, both of which are extremely deeply frozen. I'd rather
fix this by
12 matches
Mail list logo
