Hi,
please do not forget to bump minimal libc6 requirements to
libc6 (= 2.10) in libc6.symbols.hppa similarly as
in libc6.symbols.sparc.
The hppa NPTL switch is 100% *** backward *** compatible.
The pthread static initializers compiled against NPTL
will not work against linuxthreads (e)glibc
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i think the question was one about packaging rather than general use ? if you
build a package against a newer glibc version but it only uses older symbols,
then in theory it should work fine with older glibc versions. if
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:09:22AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i think the question was one about packaging rather than general use ? if
you
build a package against a newer glibc version but it only uses older
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:09:22AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i think the question was one about packaging rather than general use ? if
you
Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:09:22AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i think the question was one about packaging rather than
Frans Pop a écrit :
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc
by proper Depends: line like libc6 (= 2.10).
Does every package have to do this? I'm not very
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc
by proper Depends: line
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Carlos O'Donellcar...@systemhalted.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 11:50:27 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net
wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that
Hi.
I spent the last two days rewriting the pthread structure layouts for
hppa's nptl implementation.
It looks very nice and promising now, thanks.
I was able to restructure both pthread_mutex_t, and pthread_rwlock_t to
be 100% ABI compatible with Linuxthreads.
Strictly speaking,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Petr Salingerpetr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hi.
I spent the last two days rewriting the pthread structure layouts for
hppa's nptl implementation.
It looks very nice and promising now, thanks.
I was able to restructure both pthread_mutex_t, and
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc
by proper Depends: line like libc6 (= 2.10).
Does every package have to do this? I'm not very familiar with all the
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Frans Popelen...@planet.nl wrote:
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc
by proper Depends: line like libc6 (= 2.10).
Does
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
[Changing debian-bsd to debian-glibc, probably more appropriate to
discuss about the internal glibc code ;-)]
may I ask you for status of hppa nptl switch ?
Petr, Aurelian,
I spent the last two days rewriting
for status of hppa nptl switch ?
The work is going very well.
The work for the switch is done, but during testing I came across
usability problems with larger programs. I'm currently debugging this.
I think I need about a week more for debugging at this point.
Have you also been able to fix
16 matches
Mail list logo
