Samuel Thibault, on Mon 21 Dec 2015 18:14:37 +0100, wrote:
> Well, actually IIRC it's a glibc issue, not just a libpthread issue, so
> it needs to be fixed there, possibly by just commiting the Debian patch,
> I'll have a closer look.
Yes, it's a glibc bug. I'll submit a change to glibc which
Hello,
Aurelien Jarno, on Sun 13 Dec 2015 19:24:40 +0100, wrote:
> On 2015-12-12 18:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2015-12-12 10:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 12 Dec 2015 09:32:42 +, wrote:
> > > > debian/patches/any/local-stdio-lock.diff: drop, it was needed for
>
On 2015-12-12 18:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-12-12 10:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 12 Dec 2015 09:32:42 +, wrote:
> > > debian/patches/any/local-stdio-lock.diff: drop, it was needed for
> > > LinuxThreads support.
> >
> > I believe we need it for hurd-i386's
Author: aurel32
Date: 2015-12-12 09:32:42 + (Sat, 12 Dec 2015)
New Revision: 6813
Removed:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/patches/any/local-stdio-lock.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/patches/series
Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 12 Dec 2015 09:32:42 +, wrote:
> debian/patches/any/local-stdio-lock.diff: drop, it was needed for
> LinuxThreads support.
I believe we need it for hurd-i386's libpthread too.
Samuel
On 2015-12-12 10:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 12 Dec 2015 09:32:42 +, wrote:
> > debian/patches/any/local-stdio-lock.diff: drop, it was needed for
> > LinuxThreads support.
>
> I believe we need it for hurd-i386's libpthread too.
Can you please check? If it is still
6 matches
Mail list logo
