On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:14:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
I've tested what would be the size saving when building glibc with -Os:
Huh, I think I've checked whether -Os helped pretty much everything in
d-i, but never thought to try libc. Good idea, and this space
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of pth, Luis Bustamante [EMAIL PROTECTED],
has orphaned this package.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.6-3
Severity: important
...on aptitude upgrade (actually U then g 'n g in the gui), I get:
a45:~# aptitude
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Reading changelogs... Done
Extracting templates from packages:
Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.6-3
Severity: important
...on aptitude upgrade (actually U then g 'n g in the gui), I get:
a45:~# aptitude
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Reading changelogs... Done
Extracting
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
These libraries were found in /usr/local/lib:
librt.so.19
librt.so.19.0.1
What is this library, and why is it installed? Glibc is trying to
prevent conflicts with other versions of the C library, which includes
a library named
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:09:13 -0500, Daniel wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
These libraries were found in /usr/local/lib:
librt.so.19
librt.so.19.0.1
What is this library, and why is it installed?
..doh! I have
Your message dated Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:04:23 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line ..close it, was: Bug#356857: libc6-dev: ..dependency typo?
Stops aptitude upgrade.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Robert Millan wrote:
As you can see in the other mail, it seems to cause some breakage with nptl
and
librt. I'm not sure if d-i needs threading at all (or even what librt is ;).
Is that an issue for libc-udeb ?
Yes, I think that the graphical installer currently uses threads in at
least one
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 356844 glibc
Bug#356844: sysklogd changes facility LOG_KERN to LOG_USER
Bug reassigned from package `sysklogd' to `glibc'.
severity 356844 wishlist
Bug#356844: sysklogd changes facility LOG_KERN to LOG_USER
Severity set to `wishlist'.
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:16:09 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Version: 2.6.13+0rc3-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:16:09 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Version: 2.6.13+0rc3-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 356844 syslog(3) silently turns facility LOG_KERN to LOG_USER
Bug#356844: sysklogd changes facility LOG_KERN to LOG_USER
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
12 matches
Mail list logo
