r4066 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/hurd-i386 testsuite-checking

Author: sthibault Date: 2010-01-07 10:21:50 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010) New Revision: 4066 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/cvs-getcwd.diff glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/cvs-setsid.diff glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/submitted-posix_opt.h.diff

r4067 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/testsuite-checking

Author: sthibault Date: 2010-01-07 10:26:13 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010) New Revision: 4067 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-i486-gnu-libc Log: tst-cpucount fails to link due to missing support Modified:

Online Courses for Iowa Teachers

ONLINE COURSES FOR TEACHERS Would you care to receive periodic emails about our highly regarded online courses for teachers? If so click here. http://www.admail.net/confirm/19b3d65/55cd7401/ If not, you are automatically opted-out and you will not receive another email from us unless you click

Bug#563987: /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2: hesiod users not fully supported

Ken Raeburn a écrit : Aurelien Jarno wrote: hesiod is not supposed to be used to provide password. Even if used that way, I don't really see the point of providing a shadow database though hesiod, as the data will anyway be public, as published in the DNS. Certainly not password

Bug#563987: /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2: hesiod users not fully supported

Aurelien Jarno wrote: hesiod is not supposed to be used to provide password. Even if used that way, I don't really see the point of providing a shadow database though hesiod, as the data will anyway be public, as published in the DNS. Certainly not password authentication data, but it can

Bug#563987: /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2: hesiod users not fully supported

Aurelien Jarno wrote: Wouldn't it be possible to also use Kerberos for shadow information, as it is actually where the encrypted passwords are stored? Kerberos doesn't necessarily have the information in its database, and the protocol provides no way to pass the information around.

Bug#563987: /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2: hesiod users not fully supported

Ken Raeburn a écrit : Aurelien Jarno wrote: Wouldn't it be possible to also use Kerberos for shadow information, as it is actually where the encrypted passwords are stored? Kerberos doesn't necessarily have the information in its database, and the protocol provides no way to pass the

r4068 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . sysdeps testsuite-checking

Author: aurel32 Date: 2010-01-07 19:56:30 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010) New Revision: 4068 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-sparc64b-linux-gnu-sparcv9b Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/sparc64.mk

r4069 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

Author: aurel32 Date: 2010-01-07 22:10:09 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010) New Revision: 4069 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Upload to unstable Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

Bug#564008: marked as done (FTBFS: Applying patch kfreebsd/local-no-SOCK_NONBLOCK.diff fails)

Your message dated Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:49:41 + with message-id e1nt1aj-0007rq...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#564008: fixed in eglibc 2.10.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #564008, regarding FTBFS: Applying patch kfreebsd/local-no-SOCK_NONBLOCK.diff fails to be marked as done.

r4071 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-lenny/debian: . patches patches/any

Author: aurel32 Date: 2010-01-07 23:13:35 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010) New Revision: 4071 Added: glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-lenny/debian/patches/any/submitted-nis-shadow.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-lenny/debian/changelog