Bug#934080: marked as done ([libc6] Significant degradation in the memory effectivity of the memory allocator)

2019-08-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:00:38 +0200
with message-id <20190808170038.gb26...@aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#934080: [libc6] Significant degradation in the memory 
effectivity of the memory allocator
has caused the Debian Bug report #934080,
regarding [libc6] Significant degradation in the memory effectivity of the 
memory allocator
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
934080: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934080
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: libc6
Version: 2.19, 2.24, 2.28
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Initial condition of the problem representing is a program in the single 
source code, built on-and for Debian 7, 8, 9, 10 with a result in the 
Live disks.


The program represents a web-interface of several pages, where here used 
only the first page.


In building the first page there used wide range of memory chunks: small 
objects of the C++ classes (~100 bytes), resources of the image files 
(~10 kbytes), GD memory blocks (~1 kbytes), so on


The live disks were started under VirtualBox 5.2, where the got data was 
measured by *top*.


The data measuring under VirtualBox performed into the next stages:
1. Start the program and set the initial state, fixing the memory 
allocation — *measuring the initial memory consumption value*

2. Perform the allocation-freeing iteration
2.1. Open the first Web-interface page from a Web-browser of the host system
2.2. Close the page on the Web-browser
2.3. Wait to close-freeing session of the first Web-interface page on 
the program side, 1 minute — *measuring the iteration **memory 
consumption value*

3. Return to the stage 2 and repeating 5 iterations

The stage 2.3 tested to real freeing all the allocated memory blocks 
both by the objects counters and by *valgrind*!


In the result we have next data:

Environment 	Initially, MB 	Iter. 1, MB 	Iter. 2, MB 	Iter. 3, MB 	Iter. 
4, MB 	Iter. 5, MB 	Resume
Debian 10 amd64, GLibC 2.28, GCC 8.3.0 	182 	191.5 	199 	206 	212 	212 
Satiated on the iteration*4*, base consumption 9.5 MB, extra consumption 
20 MB (*200* %), liboscada.so 3.5 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.74 MB
Debian 9 amd64, GLibC 2.24, GCC 6.3.0 	160 	170 	178 	179 	183 	185 
Satiated on the iteration*5*, base consumption 10 MB, extra consumption 
15 MB (*150* %), liboscada.so 3.5 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.72 MB
Debian 8 amd64, GLibC 2.19, GCC 4.9.2 	125.5 	133 	139 	139 	139 	139 
Satiated on the iteration*2*, base consumption 7.5 MB, extra consumption 
6 MB (*80* %), liboscada.so 3.8 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.79 MB
Debian 7 amd64, GLibC 2.13, GCC 4.7.2 	101 	108 	111 	112 	112 	112 
Satiated on the iteration*2*, base consumption 7 MB, extra consumption 4 
MB (*57* %), liboscada.so 3.4 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.85 MB
Debian 10 i386, GLibC 2.28, GCC 8.3.0 	151 	158 	162.5 	166 	166 	166 
Satiated on the iteration*3*, base consumption 7 MB, extra consumption 8 
MB (*114* %), liboscada.so 3.7 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.9 MB
Debian 9 i386, GLibC 2.24, GCC 6.3.0 	125 	131 	132 	136 	136 	139 
Satiated on the iteration*5*, base consumption 6 MB, extra consumption 8 
MB (*133* %), liboscada.so 3.7 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.9 MB
Debian 8 i386, GLibC 2.19, GCC 4.9.2 	92.5 	99 	101.5 	103 	103.5 	103.5 
	Satiated on the iteration*2*, base consumption 6.5 MB, extra 
consumption 4.5 (*69* %), liboscada.so 3.6 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.94 MB
Debian 7 i386, GLibC 2.13, GCC 4.7.2 	70 	76 	76 	76 	77 	77 	Satiated 
on the iteration*2*, base consumption 6 MB, extra consumption 1 MB 
(*16* %), liboscada.so 3.6 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.9 MB
ALTLinux 6 i386, GLibC 2.11.3, GCC 4.5.4 	69 	74 	75 	75 	75 	75 
Satiated on the iteration*2*, base consumption 5 MB, extra consumption 1 
MB (*20* %), liboscada.so 2.3 MB, ui_WebVision.so 0.9 MB


From the data we have the memory effectivity on AMD64 and I386 platform:

and the absolute initial size for the both platform:



I know about "the Memory Allocation Tunables" 
(https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Memory-Allocation-Tunables.html) 
and have tried them but:
- I have not got any effect from environments like to 
"GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.malloc.trim_threshold=128" on Debian 10
- If the tunables real work, why their do not apply globally (on the 
system level) to return the memory effectivity to the level of the 
Debian 7 (GLibC 2.13)?
- If the new memory allocator (into GLibC 2.28) is so good, how can I 
return its memory effectivity to the level of the Debian 7 (GLibC 2.13)?


The tested program and the analyse page 

Re: tzdata 2019b-1

2019-08-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2019-08-08 15:27, Josh Pollara wrote:
> When can we expect tzdata 2019b-1 to be available in stretch?

I have no idea why it has been uploaded only to sid. I'll try to work on
that in the next days.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net



tzdata 2019b-1

2019-08-08 Thread Josh Pollara
When can we expect tzdata 2019b-1 to be available in stretch?