LOJADOTELEMOVEL.COM 12 de Agosto 2002
http://www.lojadotelemovel.com
][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][ BOAS FÉRIAS ][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][
--Ouça rádio e mantenha-se atento às chamadas
Onde quer que se encontre, não perca o contacto com quem lhe liga. Auriculares com
rádio FM stere
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:11:51PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>
> Daniel,
> Ok. I re-read you message and follow it now. The problem
> with using the versioning fixup if it doesn't go into
> gcc 3.2 is that the sister patch required for glibc is unlikely
> to go into glibc-2-2-branch eithe
Daniel,
Ok. I re-read you message and follow it now. The problem
with using the versioning fixup if it doesn't go into
gcc 3.2 is that the sister patch required for glibc is unlikely
to go into glibc-2-2-branch either so we will have to add
both in by hand. I'm not sure what happens if you u
Daniel,
I don't quite understand how to read what you just wrote.
Are you saying that if FSF GCC ships without Franz's
versioning changes for gcc 3.2 that you will oppose adding them
in later as patches to debian or what? Personally I am agnostic
on this as the only example Franz has given me
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:19:12PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> gotom,
> Could we possibly hold off on 2.2.5-14 until gcc 3.2 is
> officially released? Each debian arch will need to carefully
> evaluate what sort of libgcc-compat patches they will need
> for building with gcc-3.2. Currently on
gotom,
Could we possibly hold off on 2.2.5-14 until gcc 3.2 is
officially released? Each debian arch will need to carefully
evaluate what sort of libgcc-compat patches they will need
for building with gcc-3.2. Currently only ppc has its
libgcc-compat patches in glibc-2-2-branch (I think that
In /usr/share/doc/libc6/changelog.Debian.gz of
libc6_2.2.5-13_i386.deb Ben Collins wrote:
[...]
- Remove db1 compat library. The only user I know of this is
coda. Coda can include it's own version of the library now.
I've emailed the coda maintainer.
[...]
but apache (apache_1.3.26-1_i386.deb)
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:34:13AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:56:30AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Sounds like a good idea. Someone has already offered to do exactly this
> > > (and please don't use th
GOTO,
> Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > > glibc22-hppa-unwind.dpatch
> > > 2.2 CVS:not in
> > > 2.3 CVS:not in
> > > Comment:After checking it's ok or not, then submit to upstream
> > > if it's correct. This patch is applied only kernel
> > >
At Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:49:30 +0200,
Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
> > So, we should keep applying only the below patch as Debian specific?
> > [...]
>
> And the same for lchown, see below for the full patch.
Thanks!
I've modified 'glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch' with your patch in glibc CVS.
-- gotom
Hi,
I tagged the snapshot of release glibc 2.2.5-13 as 'glibc_2_2_5-13'.
Now we've started to make 2.2.5-14.
I plan to update debian/patches/glibc-cvs.dpatch up to today's
glibc-2-2-branch upstream CVS stated by Ben Collins. This update also
fixes alpha build failure pointed out by Jeff Bailey.
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:gotom
time: Sun Aug 11 07:19:31 PDT 2002
Log Message:
- patches/sh-sysdep.dpatch: Added the patch to compile for sh[34]
sh[34]eb. Closes: #156273
- patches/glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch: Newer m68k debian specific
compatib
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sun Aug 11 07:19:30 PDT 2002
Log Message:
- patches/sh-sysdep.dpatch: Added the patch to compile for sh[34]
sh[34]eb. Closes: #156273
- patches/glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch: Newer m68k debian specific
compatibility pa
At Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:44:39 -0400,
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > glibc22-hppa-unwind.dpatch
> > 2.2 CVS:not in
> > 2.3 CVS:not in
> > Comment:After checking it's ok or not, then submit to upstream
> > if it's correct. This patch is applied only
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:22:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Hi,
> So, we should keep applying only the below patch as Debian specific?
> [...]
And the same for lchown, see below for the full patch.
-Michael
diff -urN glibc-2.2.5.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/chown.c
glibc-2.2.5/sysd
At Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:47:41 -0400,
Ben Collins wrote:
> > string2-pointer-arith.dpatch
> > 2.2 CVS:not in
> > 2.3 CVS:not in
> > Comment:I tested sample programs (compiled with gcc-2.95, 3.0,
> > 3.1) stated in #45824, #44491, #44697, but I c
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:gotom
time: Sun Aug 11 06:26:34 PDT 2002
Log Message:
* GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- patches/sh-sysdep.dpatch: applied. Closes: #156273
Files:
changed:0list
added: sh-sysdep.dpatch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sun Aug 11 06:26:34 PDT 2002
Log Message:
* GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- patches/sh-sysdep.dpatch: applied. Closes: #156273
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
At Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:44:43 +0200,
Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
> > glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch
> > 2.2 CVS:not in
> > 2.3 CVS:not in
> > Comment:Should be merged within upstream if it's ok.
> > Status: merge
>
> No, see bug #78937 for details. And I sup
> binutils_2.12.90.0.14-1_i386.deb
> libc6_2.2.5-12_i386.deb
> libc6-dev_2.2.5-12_i386.deb
> gcc-2.95_1%3a2.95.4-10_i386.deb
These are known to work perfectly well.
> nm shows those symbols in libc-2.2.5.so (all "U") and in ld-2.2.5.so
> (all "B" or "T") only, for the dynamic libraries in /lib.
Package: glibc
Version: 2.2.5-13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm one of the Debian/sh porters (see http://debian.dodes.org/sh).
Here's a patch for glibc's SuperH support (tested with 2.2.5-13).
Please include this in the package.
http://debian.dodes.org/debian/patches/sh-sysdep.
Please use <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to reply if at all convenient. The
@tleepslib address seems to not be working (the University CC won't
give me an MX? or maybe it's our packet filcher). If not, I'll check
the website, but I won't respond as quickly in that case.
> "ben" = Ben Collins <[EMAIL
22 matches
Mail list logo
