Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 160683 libc6
Bug#160683: date: long timezone offset sighlently changed
Bug reassigned from package `shellutils' to `libc6'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Thu Sep 12 16:58:40 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/control.mk: debian/control should Depend on
debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl
- debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl: Actually add the dependancy on
libdb1-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:jbailey
time: Thu Sep 12 16:58:40 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/control.mk: debian/control should Depend on
debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl
- debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl: Actually add the dependancy on
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d
who:jbailey
time: Thu Sep 12 16:58:40 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/control.mk: debian/control should Depend on
debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl
- debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl: Actually add the dependancy on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 159633 wishlist
Bug#159633: strncpy on alpha/libc broken
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
severity 159633 wishlist
thanks
With the glibc_2.2.15-14.2 upload, alpha is using the generic C implementation
for everything that used to use stxncpy. While getting the hand tuned asm
fixed is still a good idea, it is no longer urgent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:03:09AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > Anyway, you can always disable the assembly version completely
> > until a fixed version becomes available.
> I'm thinking this is the best idea -- any objections? I can upload
> a 14.2 that uses the C implementation on alpha, and
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:48:33PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I only object to the extent that I don't think everyone who's been
> > looking at the Alpha patch has agreed that it's right, otherwise I
> > would've done the upload yesterday. If everyo
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:42:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I've been able to successfully builds sparc from current CVS using
> gcc-3.2. With the exception of four math test failures (ulps need
> updating, and which Jakub is doing), it passed just fine.
> I did need a libgcc-compat to take c
I've been able to successfully builds sparc from current CVS using
gcc-3.2. With the exception of four math test failures (ulps need
updating, and which Jakub is doing), it passed just fine.
I did need a libgcc-compat to take care of somethings. I am not going to
add that to our CVS, since glibc
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I only object to the extent that I don't think everyone who's been
> looking at the Alpha patch has agreed that it's right, otherwise I
> would've done the upload yesterday. If everyone agrees, the current
> plan is to do it tonight.
As I have pointed
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:30:12PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Your Glibc maintainer team is trying to get glibc 2.3 ready for
> general consumption, and we need some help for arch's that we're not
> familiar with. So far we have the following covered:
The attached two dpatches are needed to get
12 matches
Mail list logo
