> Carlos,
> Did you regenerate your sysdeps/hppa/fpu/libm-test-ulps?
> You have to do that for glibc 2.3. Look at...
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-09/msg1.html
>
> which shows the steps you need to go through.
> Jack
>
That's the easy
Carlos,
Did you regenerate your sysdeps/hppa/fpu/libm-test-ulps?
You have to do that for glibc 2.3. Look at...
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-09/msg1.html
which shows the steps you need to go through.
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
> Carlos,
>It looks like Ulrich is preparing to kick out glibc shortly
> and roll any remaining fixes into glibc 2.3.1...
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-09/msg00072.html
>
> Is hppa building cleanly and passing all of make check from
> current glibc cvs? If not you might w
> Carlos,
>I thought someone told me that the debian packages
> for hppa had been run through my findsyms perl script
> and that no undefined libgcc symbols were detected in
> any of the binaries or libraries? If that is the case
> you don't need a libgcc-compat at all.
>
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux coltrane 2.4.19 #6 SMP Mon Aug 26 19:26:10 EST 2002 i686 unknown
unknown GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-4The Berkeley datab
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:14:13AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 03:46:34PM +0900, Julian Stoev wrote:
> > Today's SPARC upgrade is broken.
> >
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-sparc64_2.2.5-11.2_sparc.deb
>(--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite `/usr
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:44:40AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No you don't, all you need to do is to make the errno macro
> > conditional.
>
> And if we do that, libraries which use the non-macro version will come
> into existence sooner or later,
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The slowdown is a price to be paid, otherwise we would need a
>> different set of almost all shared libraries for linking with
>> multi-threading programs. I think we already had this situation, and
>> it w
8 matches
Mail list logo