Re: glibc 2.3.1-1 needs restarting network services
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Anthony Towns wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:38:57AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: After upgrading libc package, then please stop-and-start network services/daemons, because name service switch is changed in glibc 2.3. Uh, you're going to fix this in a new upload, right? (ie, automate restarting other programs just as has happened with previous upgrades where this was necessary) The is the new unstable. We don't care about upgrades. Didn't you get the memo? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165374: Breaks when upgrading to 2.3.1
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 12:35, Jeff Bailey wrote: Do you think making libc6-dbg pre-depend instead of depend'ing on libc6 (= 2.3.1-1) would work? Should --- though, according to policy, libc6 will only be unpacked. But since it is Essential: yes, it should work that way. What a fun bug. Hope you have sash installed ;-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#165374: Breaks when upgrading to 2.3.1
Jeff Bailey said: It had never occured to me to put the debug path in the cache file. I'm not sure how common of a scenario that is, or it should've bitten someone before. I suppose so. I don't really know why I put it there in the first place. :-) I was debugging a program and thought that was the easiest way to use the dbg libs. -- Best regards, Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:38, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Incidentally, you should also broaden the list of relevant services; I would suggest adding kdm (and other display managers?), ssh-krb5, and apache2 at the least. Don't add display managers. At least with gdm I'm pretty sure that will kill X sessions... [Not willing to test this, of course] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: build failure of 2.3.1 on s390 [was: status 2.2.92 on s390]
On Friday 18 October 2002 16:33, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:59PM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote: This means glibc 2.2.92 looks rather complete on s390. 2.3.1-1 appears to have failed to build on s390 - I'm doing another upload this evening. Can you take a look to see what's up? The binutils 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390. Could you change the build-dep to 2.13.90.0.4-1 for s390. Thanks, Gerhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165417: libc6: ldd depends on file for files with exec bit off
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:42:52 +1000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ldd script fails on non-executable files (such as most libraries)
if the file package is not installed.
This is caused by debian/patches/ldd.dpatch, which uses 'file' command.
See below diff:
- eval $add_env '$file' || result=1
+ if [ ! -x $file ] eval file -L $file 2/dev/null \
+ | sed 10q | egrep $file_magic_regex /dev/null; then
+eval $add_env ${RTLD} '$file' || result=1
+ else
+eval $add_env '$file' || result=1
+ fi
I think to resolve this bug is 2 way:
(a) Libc6 has 'Suggests: file' field.
(b) Just drop or modify ldd.dpatch not to degrade ldd speed.
debian/changelog says:
glibc (2.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* ldd.dpatch: New and improved fix for the no execute permissions
buglet. Now, ldd will not call the file command for every file. This
should speed up dpkg-shlibdeps a lot.
Take (a) is easy way, but (b) is not realistic action?
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:45 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456 Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/rules.d by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d who:gotom time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:46 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456 Files: changed:shlibs.mk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/control.in by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in who:jbailey time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390 require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them. Files: changed:main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390 require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them. Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165456: libc6.shlib must lib* (= 2.3.1)
Oops, At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:12:10 +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote: Of course, it won't run I should add on libc6 2.2.5-15 if I hold libc6 here /usr/sbin/cannaserver: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by /usr/sbin/cannaserver) Thanks, Fumitoshi UKAI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165358: smtp problems after update _and_ reboot
Hi, I use postfix for local smtp. After upgrading kmail had trouble talking to it. I then rebooted to ensure that all progs (at least those non static) were using the new libc. There were still problems with smtp... Also my squid proxy was refusing connections... Think there is more to this problem that restarting apps (reverting to 2.2.5-15 fixes things) Ed Tomlinson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
hi! my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the known glib problem. glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) i don't know how to provide more usefull information as it is statically linked and started from xinetd (which i restarted and i even rebooted my machine) ciao -justus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165358: (no subject)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-13
Followup-For: Bug #165358
Hi,
with the new version of libc, I have :
1) htmerge (part of htdig package) that eats all of the memory and all
of the swap then the system begin killing tasks.
2) ppp
During the whole ppp session I get the following messages :
Oct 19 17:12:29 f5ibh modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
Oct 19 17:13:00 f5ibh last message repeated 772 times
Oct 19 17:14:01 f5ibh last message repeated 1526 times
Oct 19 17:15:02 f5ibh last message repeated 1608 times
Oct 19 17:16:02 f5ibh last message repeated 1573 times
Oct 19 17:17:04 f5ibh last message repeated 1554 times
Oct 19 17:18:05 f5ibh last message repeated 1562 times
without any module name.
Back to 2.2.5-13 and all is fine.
--
Regards
Jean-Luc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian-f5ibh 2.4.20-pre11 #1 mer oct 16 09:41:04 CEST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=fr_FReuro, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (ignored: LC_ALL set)
-- no debconf information
¡CRPDDzf¢Ú y¸
bmÊު笶X¬¶Ç^n§¢¸0ØZ²æãyËh~éì¹» ®ÞNº.nW¢{ZrÙb²Ù²×«+-±×©è®
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:05, Justus Schwartz wrote: glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) ldd /path/to/glftpd Is it really linked statically? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#165411: inetd: complaining about missing identd user
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 165411 libc6 Bug#165411: inetd: complaining about missing identd user Bug reassigned from package `netkit-inetd' to `libc6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#165374: Breaks when upgrading to 2.3.1
Jeff Bailey said: It had never occured to me to put the debug path in the cache file. I'm not sure how common of a scenario that is, or it should've bitten someone before. I suppose so. I don't really know why I put it there in the first place. :-) I was debugging a program and thought that was the easiest way to use the dbg libs. -- Best regards, Per
Re: build failure of 2.3.1 on s390 [was: status 2.2.92 on s390]
On Friday 18 October 2002 16:33, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:59PM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote: This means glibc 2.2.92 looks rather complete on s390. 2.3.1-1 appears to have failed to build on s390 - I'm doing another upload this evening. Can you take a look to see what's up? The binutils 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390. Could you change the build-dep to 2.13.90.0.4-1 for s390. Thanks, Gerhard
Bug#165417: libc6: ldd depends on file for files with exec bit off
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:42:52 +1000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ldd script fails on non-executable files (such as most libraries)
if the file package is not installed.
This is caused by debian/patches/ldd.dpatch, which uses 'file' command.
See below diff:
- eval $add_env '$file' || result=1
+ if [ ! -x $file ] eval file -L $file 2/dev/null \
+ | sed 10q | egrep $file_magic_regex /dev/null; then
+eval $add_env ${RTLD} '$file' || result=1
+ else
+eval $add_env '$file' || result=1
+ fi
I think to resolve this bug is 2 way:
(a) Libc6 has 'Suggests: file' field.
(b) Just drop or modify ldd.dpatch not to degrade ldd speed.
debian/changelog says:
glibc (2.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* ldd.dpatch: New and improved fix for the no execute permissions
buglet. Now, ldd will not call the file command for every file. This
should speed up dpkg-shlibdeps a lot.
Take (a) is easy way, but (b) is not realistic action?
-- gotom
Bug#165456: libc6.shlib must lib* (= 2.3.1)
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1 Severity: important program compiled with libc6 2.3.1 requires libc6 (= 2.3.1), but libc6 2.3.1-1 still has libc 6 libc6 (= 2.2.5-13) in libc6.shlibs. For example, canna 3.5b2-50.deb is Package: canna Version: 3.5b2-50 Architecture: i386 Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.5-13), libcanna1g, debconf, adduser (= 3.34) However, it has the binary like this: # dpkg -x canna_3.5b2-50_i386.deb x # objdump --all-headers x/usr/sbin/cannaserver : Version References: required from libc.so.6: 0x0d696913 0x00 04 GLIBC_2.3 0x0d696911 0x00 03 GLIBC_2.1 0x0d696910 0x00 02 GLIBC_2.0 Of course, it won't run /usr/sbin/cannaserver: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by /usr/sbin/cannaserver) Appearently, it must depends on libc6 (= 2.3.1) Thanks, Fumitoshi UKAI
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/rules.d by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d who:gotom time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:46 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456 Files: changed:shlibs.mk
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:45 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456 Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/control.in by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in who:jbailey time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390 require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them. Files: changed:main
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390 require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them. Files: changed:changelog
Bug#165358: smtp problems after update _and_ reboot
Hi, I use postfix for local smtp. After upgrading kmail had trouble talking to it. I then rebooted to ensure that all progs (at least those non static) were using the new libc. There were still problems with smtp... Also my squid proxy was refusing connections... Think there is more to this problem that restarting apps (reverting to 2.2.5-15 fixes things) Ed Tomlinson
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
hi! my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the known glib problem. glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) i don't know how to provide more usefull information as it is statically linked and started from xinetd (which i restarted and i even rebooted my machine) ciao -justus
Bug#165358: (no subject)
Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.5-13 Followup-For: Bug #165358 Hi, with the new version of libc, I have : 1) htmerge (part of htdig package) that eats all of the memory and all of the swap then the system begin killing tasks. 2) ppp During the whole ppp session I get the following messages : Oct 19 17:12:29 f5ibh modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module Oct 19 17:13:00 f5ibh last message repeated 772 times Oct 19 17:14:01 f5ibh last message repeated 1526 times Oct 19 17:15:02 f5ibh last message repeated 1608 times Oct 19 17:16:02 f5ibh last message repeated 1573 times Oct 19 17:17:04 f5ibh last message repeated 1554 times Oct 19 17:18:05 f5ibh last message repeated 1562 times without any module name. Back to 2.2.5-13 and all is fine. -- Regards Jean-Luc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian-f5ibh 2.4.20-pre11 #1 mer oct 16 09:41:04 CEST 2002 i586 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (ignored: LC_ALL set) -- no debconf information
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 06:05:16PM +0200, Justus Schwartz wrote: hi! my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the known glib problem. glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) i don't know how to provide more usefull information as it is statically linked and started from xinetd (which i restarted and i even rebooted my machine) Static binaries tend to break when you update glibc. That's a sad fact of life... they don't provide compatibility for NSS modules. Not sure we can do anything about this. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:05, Justus Schwartz wrote: glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) ldd /path/to/glftpd Is it really linked statically? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
* Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021019 22:07]: On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:05, Justus Schwartz wrote: static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) ldd /path/to/glftpd Is it really linked statically? yes it is (not a dynamic executable). i found a strange proposal on the glftpd.com how to fix it for glfptd for the moment (replace all occurences of nss/libn with something else *g*) . but i hope, they will provide new binaries. so i learned it's the problem with the nss modules, and not a libc bug. having still some trouble ;) so long -justus
Bug#165509: libc6: At least Sun's JVM no longer works against libc6
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: critical Sun's j2sdk 1.4.0 no longer functions with this release of libc6: -([EMAIL PROTECTED])-(~)- java Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_waitpid, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux tenshu 2.4.19 #1 Fri Sep 13 22:35:31 BST 2002 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux Versions of the packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-6The Berkeley database routines [glibc 2.0/2.
Bug#165509: marked as done (libc6: At least Sun's JVM no longer works against libc6)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:35:42 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#165509: libc6: At least Sun's JVM no longer works against libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2002 01:25:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 19 20:25:31 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tenshu.black-sun.co.uk (tenshu-lan.black-sun.co.uk) [81.6.193.20] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1834qR-0006Z8-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:25:31 -0500 Received: from cmsj by tenshu-lan.black-sun.co.uk with local (Exim #VERSION DETAILS SUPPRESSED#)) id 1834qO-00017k-00; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:25:28 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: At least Sun's JVM no longer works against libc6 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:25:28 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: critical Sun's j2sdk 1.4.0 no longer functions with this release of libc6: -([EMAIL PROTECTED])-(~)- java Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_waitpid, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux tenshu 2.4.19 #1 Fri Sep 13 22:35:31 BST 2002 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux Versions of the packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-6The Berkeley database routines [glibc 2.0/2. --- Received: (at 165509-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2002 01:35:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 19 20:35:42 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from crack.them.org [65.125.64.184] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18350I-0006vE-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:35:42 -0500 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1835vm-0004sS-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:35:07 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18350I-0005wZ-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:35:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:35:42 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#165509: libc6: At least Sun's JVM no longer works against libc6 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:25:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: critical Sun's j2sdk 1.4.0 no longer functions with this release of libc6: -([EMAIL PROTECTED])-(~)- java Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_waitpid, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Look for 1.4.1. I believe it's been out for a long time now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Bug#165358: libc6 breaks static linked glftpd
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:14:41 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 06:05:16PM +0200, Justus Schwartz wrote: my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the known glib problem. glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6 because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5) i don't know how to provide more usefull information as it is statically linked and started from xinetd (which i restarted and i even rebooted my machine) Static binaries tend to break when you update glibc. That's a sad fact of life... they don't provide compatibility for NSS modules. Not sure we can do anything about this. Well, it's serious problem, many static linked binaries (compiled before 2.3) get segv. I don't know how to fix. IMHO, one way to fix it is bumping up glibc nss version, because breaking ABI back compatibility always change its lib.so version (Of course, it needs upstream decision). Thus, libnss_files.so.3 - libnss_files-2.3.1.so (Don't test unless you know what is occured). -- gotom
Bug#165512: marked as done (libc6 breaks wine)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:45:31 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#165512: libc6 breaks wine has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2002 02:27:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 19 21:27:38 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.tsn.cc [202.22.163.2] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1835oX-lO-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:27:37 -0500 Received: (qmail 22798 invoked by uid 8002); 20 Oct 2002 02:28:02 - Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (202.22.163.145) by mail.tsn.cc with SMTP; 20 Oct 2002 02:28:02 - Subject: libc6 breaks wine From: Drewbian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 20 Oct 2002 12:39:47 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: ** Package:libc6 Version:2.3.1-1 After upgrading to this package launching wine give this error message wine /mnt/win-c/Program\ Files/Internet\ Explorer/iexplore.exe /usr/bin/wine.bin: relocation error: /usr/bin/../lib/libntdll.dll.so: symbol __libc_fork, version GLIBC_2.1.2 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Wine failed with return code 127 Downgrading to a to an earlier package version (libc6_2.2.5-15) got wine working again. thank you. --- Received: (at 165512-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2002 03:45:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 19 22:45:37 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] ([M+cgLUIra1hS7EWALiT+Y2YsNUtHlQ1U]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 183721-0003yh-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:45:37 -0500 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCFAC33C1; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:45:36 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:45:31 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Drewbian [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#165512: libc6 breaks wine In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: At 20 Oct 2002 12:39:47 +1000, Drewbian wrote: After upgrading to this package launching wine give this error message wine /mnt/win-c/Program\ Files/Internet\ Explorer/iexplore.exe /usr/bin/wine.bin: relocation error: /usr/bin/../lib/libntdll.dll.so: symbol __libc_fork, version GLIBC_2.1.2 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Wine failed with return code 127 Downgrading to a to an earlier package version (libc6_2.2.5-15) got wine working again. __libc_fork is libc internal function, not public function. It's not libc, but wine's issue. -- gotom
