On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:08:45PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
What?
=
During the changeover from GNU/Libc 2.2.x to 2.3.x HPPA has changed
it's minimum GNU/Libc kernel version to 2.4.19.
I feel this was a mistake.
Why?
- More testing.
- Bugs fixed in unaligned handlers.
-
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 00:45, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-04
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.2
debian-legal has recently decided that the GNU Free Documentation
License is non-free. Therefore, at least libc.info* must be
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 03:50, Daniele Cruciani wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: normal
It stop here:
mode of `debian/locales/DEBIAN/config' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Libc/glibc-2.3.1'
touch unpacked-source
if [ ! -d patched ]; then
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: normal
Libc documentation states that trunc() function is declared in math.h.
However, math.h provided by current libc6-dev does not declared in
math.h or any header included from math.h
cat x.cpp
#include math.h
int main()
{
double d =
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: critical
Due to an oversight in my testing, if you upgrade to 2.3.1-5 on HPPA and
your kernel version if 2.4.19, then glibc will refuse to function
(minkernel is set to 2.4.19). This refusal to function is manifested as
a complaint during the
Here's your status update. Please note the **NEED HELP HERE**
sections.
glibc CVS built fine for me on debussy. Hopefully the CVS update will
fix it then and we'll have glibc compiled and up to date on all of our
arch's. Since the sparc buildd appears not to be able to compile sparc,
I'll
In reference to a message from Jeff Bailey, dated Dec 05:
Here's your status update. Please note the **NEED HELP HERE**
sections.
please also pick up 171550
randolph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:51:11AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
In reference to a message from Jeff Bailey, dated Dec 05:
Here's your status update. Please note the **NEED HELP HERE**
sections.
please also pick up 171550
Looks good.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 171778 libc6
Bug#171778: [sparc64] undefined symbols in /lib64/libc.so.6
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `libc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Thu Dec 5 16:52:57 MST 2002
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-ia64-strncpy.dpatch: New file (Closes: #171550)
Thanks to Randolph Chung.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Thu Dec 5 16:52:57 MST 2002
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-ia64-strncpy.dpatch: New file (Closes: #171550)
Thanks to Randolph Chung.
Files:
changed:0list
added: glibc23-ia64-strncpy.dpatch
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: normal
When called with -N and -Ss, rpcgen generates server templates that
are incompatible with the generated header file. (they don't adhere to
the new-style calling convention)
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Your message dated Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:56:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#171927: Acknowledgement (libc6-dev: rpcgen -N -Ss generates
uncompilable templates)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:08:45PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
What?
=
During the changeover from GNU/Libc 2.2.x to 2.3.x HPPA has changed
it's minimum GNU/Libc kernel version to 2.4.19.
I feel this was a mistake.
Why?
- More testing.
- Bugs fixed in unaligned handlers.
-
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 00:45, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-04
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.2
debian-legal has recently decided that the GNU Free Documentation
License is non-free. Therefore, at least libc.info* must be
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 03:50, Daniele Cruciani wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: normal
It stop here:
mode of `debian/locales/DEBIAN/config' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Libc/glibc-2.3.1'
touch unpacked-source
if [ ! -d patched ]; then
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: normal
Libc documentation states that trunc() function is declared in math.h.
However, math.h provided by current libc6-dev does not declared in
math.h or any header included from math.h
cat x.cpp
#include math.h
int main()
{
double d =
Why?
- More testing.
- Bugs fixed in unaligned handlers.
- Trap handler fixes.
- More things than you can shake a stick at, and all thanks to the
wonderful kernel hacking team that parisc-linux has.
That's great, but there are still problems with 2.4.19 and 2.4.20. I
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: critical
Due to an oversight in my testing, if you upgrade to 2.3.1-5 on HPPA and
your kernel version if 2.4.19, then glibc will refuse to function
(minkernel is set to 2.4.19). This refusal to function is manifested as
a complaint during the
Here's your status update. Please note the **NEED HELP HERE**
sections.
glibc CVS built fine for me on debussy. Hopefully the CVS update will
fix it then and we'll have glibc compiled and up to date on all of our
arch's. Since the sparc buildd appears not to be able to compile sparc,
I'll
In reference to a message from Jeff Bailey, dated Dec 05:
Here's your status update. Please note the **NEED HELP HERE**
sections.
please also pick up 171550
randolph
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:51:11AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
In reference to a message from Jeff Bailey, dated Dec 05:
Here's your status update. Please note the **NEED HELP HERE**
sections.
please also pick up 171550
Looks good.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
reassign 171778 libc6
thanks
I cannot find the report on http://bugs.debian.org/src:glibc
http://bugs.debian.org/171778 lists the maintainer as
unknown. Reassigning the report so you get aware of it ;-)
This currently breaks bootstrap of gcc-3.2 on sparc. See
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 171778 libc6
Bug#171778: [sparc64] undefined symbols in /lib64/libc.so.6
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `libc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 171778 libc6
Bug#171778: [sparc64] undefined symbols in /lib64/libc.so.6
Bug reassigned from package `libc-sparc64' to `libc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Thu Dec 5 16:52:57 MST 2002
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-ia64-strncpy.dpatch: New file (Closes: #171550)
Thanks to Randolph Chung.
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Thu Dec 5 16:52:57 MST 2002
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-ia64-strncpy.dpatch: New file (Closes: #171550)
Thanks to Randolph Chung.
Files:
changed:0list
added: glibc23-ia64-strncpy.dpatch
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: normal
When called with -N and -Ss, rpcgen generates server templates that
are incompatible with the generated header file. (they don't adhere to
the new-style calling convention)
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Your message dated Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:56:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#171927: Acknowledgement (libc6-dev: rpcgen -N -Ss
generates uncompilable templates)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
29 matches
Mail list logo
