Bug#180119: libc6: ld.so does not seem to find correct platform information for AMD K6-III

2003-02-17 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:24 +, Steve Haslam wrote: With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov version of libssl on a K6-III (i586) machine-- I had to divert the libs away, and it then loaded the i586 versions. Now with 2.3.1-11, ld.so is not loading *any*

Re: floating stacks?

2003-02-17 Thread Johannes Berg
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:07, GOTO Masanori wrote: Is your architecure i386? AFAIK, on i386 FLOATING_STACKS is defined. We don't change such part of upstream glibc. Or do I misunderstand something? Yes, it is, sorry for not noting that before-hand. From what I read on the newsgroup/mailing

Re: floating stacks?

2003-02-17 Thread GOTO Masanori
At 17 Feb 2003 12:08:33 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:07, GOTO Masanori wrote: Is your architecure i386? AFAIK, on i386 FLOATING_STACKS is defined. We don't change such part of upstream glibc. Or do I misunderstand something? Yes, it is, sorry for not noting that

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-17 Thread Guido Guenther
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: [..snip..] /usr/bin/nm __udivdi3 /usr/bin/nm __umoddi3 /usr/bin/strip __ucmpdi2 /usr/bin/strip __udivdi3 I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you mean... You mean that a binary has _udivdi3 or __umoddi3 and then

Re: floating stacks?

2003-02-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:25:07PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At 17 Feb 2003 12:08:33 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:07, GOTO Masanori wrote: Is your architecure i386? AFAIK, on i386 FLOATING_STACKS is defined. We don't change such part of upstream glibc. Or do I

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Hi Guido, Thanks for your explanation. At Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:32:42 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it might not be correct: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:44AM +0900,

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom

2003-02-17 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Mon Feb 17 09:14:03 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/libgcc-compat-all.dpatch: Fix i386 libgcc compat symbol problem, this dpatch merges with libgcc-compat-{sparc,mips}.dpatch, patched by Guido

Re: floating stacks?

2003-02-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:09:10AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: This is not an answer to Johannes' question. FLOATING_STACKS is only enabled on i386 if you specify an --enable-kernel of at least 2.3.99; that loses kernel 2.2 compatibility. Debian can't do that. Who decides when Debian

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

2003-02-17 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:12:11 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:58:21PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Hi Guido, Thanks for your explanation. At Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:32:42 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it

Bug#181409: libc6: devpts no longer mounts with grep 2.5.1-2

2003-02-17 Thread Tim Middelkoop
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-11 Severity: important Tags: patch does not mount /dev/pts on boot ./devpts.sh: line 17: [: =: unary operator expected grep changes behavior of -q (now should use -s) bug newbe ... should this bug be filed against grep fix: /etc/init.d/devpts.sh:13

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by dan

2003-02-17 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:dan time: Mon Feb 17 13:38:13 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/libc/etc/init.d/devpts.sh: Update devpts.sh to work with the new grep package (Closes: #181409). Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/libc/etc/init.d by dan

2003-02-17 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/etc/init.d who:dan time: Mon Feb 17 13:38:13 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/libc/etc/init.d/devpts.sh: Update devpts.sh to work with the new grep package (Closes: #181409). Files: changed:devpts.sh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#181409: libc6: devpts no longer mounts with grep 2.5.1-2

2003-02-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:48:31PM -0500, Tim Middelkoop wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-11 Severity: important Tags: patch does not mount /dev/pts on boot ./devpts.sh: line 17: [: =: unary operator expected grep changes behavior of -q (now should use -s) bug newbe ...

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom

2003-02-17 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Mon Feb 17 18:13:37 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/locales/DEBIAN/{postinst,templates}: Fix default environment variable Leave alone does not affect its meaning. (Closes: #180040) Files: changed:changelog --

Processed: Re: dpkg-reconfigure does not work

2003-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 178746 debconf Bug#178746: dpkg-reconfigure does not work Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `debconf'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

2.3.1-12

2003-02-17 Thread GOTO Masanori
I put packages 2.3.1-12 for i386 at http://www.debian.org/~gotom/ It fixes almost RC bugs except for license issue. No one objects, I dupload it. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom

2003-02-17 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Tue Feb 18 00:00:56 MST 2003 Log Message: more fix for debian/locales/DEBIAN/{postinst,templates,config} Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?