Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:57:41 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc6-dev: unistd.h doesn't contain setresgid prototypes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
reassign 169820 ldso
thanks
At Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:51:53 -0600,
Warren Turkal wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: wishlist
ld.so.conf should probably by default have /usr/local/lib/ in it so that
installing local packages that have libraries will work without special
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 169820 ldso
Bug#169820: libc6: ld.so.conf does not include /usr/local/lib/
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `ldso'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
I am the author of libsndfile (I am not a Debian maintainer) which uses two
functions from the C99 standard, lrint() and lrintf().
These functions exist on x86 and PowerPC Debian, but not on ia64, ARM and some
others. The libsndfile configure script detects the existance of these
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
glibc_2.3.1-16.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.1-16.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:02:00, the files will be
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
glibc_2.3.1-16.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.1-16.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:39:56, the files will be
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:25:31 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line locales debconf templates
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 47998 hurd
thanks
Greetings. Another whining complaint from a fellow
hurd enthusiast.
The fakeroot package (used by apt) makes use of some
IPC, specifically:
msgget(msg_key, IPC_CREAT|0600);
This fails (as do all other msgget calls) with
a perror return of:
Fakeroot,
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:46:40 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line malloc-bug in rpcgen (netkit-base-0.10-6.1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:03:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#185688: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
GOTO Masanori wrote:
Now, I would like to update debian-glibc into 2.3.2-1 with the latest
cvs. From my build, i386, ia64, alpha, powerpc is ok to build.
S390 can't be compiled (some header is polluted with kernel headers,
it needs investigation):
I will look into it.
Gerhard
--
To
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-15
Severity: normal
$ sudo dpkg --pending --configure
Setting up locales (2.3.1-15) ...
Generating locales...
en_GB.ISO-8859-1... done
en_GB.ISO-10646.../usr/share/i18n/locales/en_GB:25: LC_IDENTIFICATION: unknown
character in field `address'
reopen 185508
thanks
I can't see another open bug that covers this, so this should stay
open until a fixed stable version is released, shouldn't it?
GOTO Masanori's glibc23-cert-rpcxdr.dpatch should apply with only a
bit of fuzz. The only problem I encountered when rebuilding a patched
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 185508
Bug#185508: CERT Advisory CA-2003-10 Integer overflow in Sun RPC XDR library routines
(fwd)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-15
Running locale-gen with POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 in the environment produces an
error. Full output is shown below:
$ POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 local-gen
Generating locales...
en_US.ISO-8859-1...Try `localedef --help' or `localedef --usage' for
more information.
The problem
Accepted:
libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
libc6-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 12:04:58 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc: Some architectures missing functions lrint() lrintf().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
At 21 Mar 2003 13:21:56 -0800,
Kevin Buhr wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: 2.2.5-11.2
Here's a patch (to the glibc-cvs.dpatch patch) to fix the
tst_strfmon behaviour. I didn't observe a crash in tst-widetext,
so I don't have a patch for that.
The problem is that the glibc-cvs patch
Oops, you're right, it's not in -14, either. Ok. If all archs are
supposed to have the same /usr/include/sys, then I guess keep the bug
open; otherwise, close it. I'm not sure what the deal is w/ sys, I had
assumed it wasn't arch-dependant, but I don't know for sure.
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This fix is for 2.2.5-11.2, but it's stable release, so it's difficult
to fix with your patch because it's not critical bug. glibc 2.3.1-16
is already fixed, so use or develop with 2.3.1-16. All I can do is to
tag as wontfix, woody for this bug...
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:53:29 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#173486: patch for strfmon tests
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
At 22 Mar 2003 23:25:12 -0500,
Andres Salomon wrote:
Oops, you're right, it's not in -14, either. Ok. If all archs are
supposed to have the same /usr/include/sys, then I guess keep the bug
open; otherwise, close it. I'm not sure what the deal is w/ sys, I had
assumed it wasn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 47998 hurd
Bug#47998: msgget IPC not implemented
Bug reassigned from package `libc0.3-dev' to `hurd'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
At Sat, 15 Mar 2003 02:53:57 +1000,
Anthony Towns wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:34:50PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:29:02 +, James Troup wrote:
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please don't do this.
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:50:54 -
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line I love you, please call...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:57:41 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc6-dev: unistd.h doesn't contain setresgid prototypes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
reassign 169820 ldso
thanks
At Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:51:53 -0600,
Warren Turkal wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: wishlist
ld.so.conf should probably by default have /usr/local/lib/ in it so that
installing local packages that have libraries will work without special
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 169820 ldso
Bug#169820: libc6: ld.so.conf does not include /usr/local/lib/
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `ldso'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
At Sat, 15 Mar 2003 02:53:57 +1000,
Anthony Towns wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:34:50PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:29:02 +, James Troup wrote:
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please don't do this.
I am the author of libsndfile (I am not a Debian maintainer) which uses two
functions from the C99 standard, lrint() and lrintf().
These functions exist on x86 and PowerPC Debian, but not on ia64, ARM and
some
others. The libsndfile configure script detects the existance of these
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
glibc_2.3.1-16.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.1-16.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:02:00, the files will be
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
glibc_2.3.1-16.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.1-16.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:39:56, the files will be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 47998 hurd
Bug#47998: msgget IPC not implemented
Bug reassigned from package `libc0.3-dev' to `hurd'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:25:31 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line locales debconf templates
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:25:31 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line locales debconf templates
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 47998 hurd
thanks
Greetings. Another whining complaint from a fellow
hurd enthusiast.
The fakeroot package (used by apt) makes use of some
IPC, specifically:
msgget(msg_key, IPC_CREAT|0600);
This fails (as do all other msgget calls) with
a perror return of:
Fakeroot,
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:46:40 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line malloc-bug in rpcgen (netkit-base-0.10-6.1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
I've just duploaded 2.3.1-16 with urgency=high which is for sunrpc bug fix.
- debian/patches/glibc23-cert-rpcxdr.dpatch: Fix CERT Advisory
CA-2003-10 Integer overflow in Sun RPC XDR library routines
(Closes: #185508).
- debian/packages.d/glibc-doc.mk: Fix unneeded file '['
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:03:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#185508: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:03:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#185688: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:03:20 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#185275: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
GOTO Masanori wrote:
Now, I would like to update debian-glibc into 2.3.2-1 with the latest
cvs. From my build, i386, ia64, alpha, powerpc is ok to build.
S390 can't be compiled (some header is polluted with kernel headers,
it needs investigation):
I will look into it.
Gerhard
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 01:46:40AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
I don't know mips/mipsel because there are not public machine.
2.3.2 should build without major problems. gcc-3.2 misscompiles a
testcase but hopefully that's about it.
Regards,
-- Guido
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-15
Severity: normal
$ sudo dpkg --pending --configure
Setting up locales (2.3.1-15) ...
Generating locales...
en_GB.ISO-8859-1... done
en_GB.ISO-10646.../usr/share/i18n/locales/en_GB:25: LC_IDENTIFICATION:
unknown character in field `address'
reopen 185508
thanks
I can't see another open bug that covers this, so this should stay
open until a fixed stable version is released, shouldn't it?
GOTO Masanori's glibc23-cert-rpcxdr.dpatch should apply with only a
bit of fuzz. The only problem I encountered when rebuilding a patched
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 185508
Bug#185508: CERT Advisory CA-2003-10 Integer overflow in Sun RPC XDR library
routines (fwd)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-15
Running locale-gen with POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 in the environment produces an
error. Full output is shown below:
$ POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 local-gen
Generating locales...
en_US.ISO-8859-1...Try `localedef --help' or `localedef --usage' for
more information.
The problem
Accepted:
libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
libc6-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-sparc64_2.3.1-16_sparc.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-15
Severity: normal
Somewhere between -14 and -15, /usr/include/sys/io.h seems to have
disappeared for ppc (and possibly other archs).
On an i386 machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L libc6-dev|grep sys/io.h || echo nada.
/usr/include/sys/io.h
[EMAIL
At Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:02:44 -0500,
Andres Salomon wrote:
Somewhere between -14 and -15, /usr/include/sys/io.h seems to have
disappeared for ppc (and possibly other archs).
On an i386 machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L libc6-dev|grep sys/io.h || echo nada.
/usr/include/sys/io.h
[EMAIL
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 12:04:58 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc: Some architectures missing functions lrint() lrintf().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 12:04:58 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc: Some architectures missing functions lrint() lrintf().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
At 21 Mar 2003 13:21:56 -0800,
Kevin Buhr wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: 2.2.5-11.2
Here's a patch (to the glibc-cvs.dpatch patch) to fix the
tst_strfmon behaviour. I didn't observe a crash in tst-widetext,
so I don't have a patch for that.
The problem is that the glibc-cvs patch
Oops, you're right, it's not in -14, either. Ok. If all archs are
supposed to have the same /usr/include/sys, then I guess keep the bug
open; otherwise, close it. I'm not sure what the deal is w/ sys, I had
assumed it wasn't arch-dependant, but I don't know for sure.
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This fix is for 2.2.5-11.2, but it's stable release, so it's difficult
to fix with your patch because it's not critical bug. glibc 2.3.1-16
is already fixed, so use or develop with 2.3.1-16. All I can do is to
tag as wontfix, woody for this bug...
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:53:29 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#173486: patch for strfmon tests
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
At 22 Mar 2003 23:25:12 -0500,
Andres Salomon wrote:
Oops, you're right, it's not in -14, either. Ok. If all archs are
supposed to have the same /usr/include/sys, then I guess keep the bug
open; otherwise, close it. I'm not sure what the deal is w/ sys, I had
assumed it wasn't
59 matches
Mail list logo
