need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

Sorry if there's multiple copies of this email, I've tried from another address, and have difficulty confirming it got onto the list. I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. I'm trying to compile it myself, but am up against problems on a processor which does not have

need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. I'm trying to compile it myself, but am up against problems on a processor which does not have floating point capacity. The pre-compiled version above works OK, but the one I compile myself either triggers illegal instructions (s

Re: need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +1000, John August wrote: > I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. > I'm trying to compile it myself, but am > up against problems on a processor which does not have floating point > capacity. The pre-compiled version > above works O

Bug#212462: marked as done (INIT doesnt start with 2.5 kernel)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:37:48 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212462: INIT doesnt start with 2.5 kernel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#212285: marked as done (libc apt-get upgrade bug)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212285: libc apt-get upgrade bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

Sorry if there's multiple copies of this email, I've tried from another address, and have difficulty confirming it got onto the list. I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. I'm trying to compile it myself, but am up against problems on a processor which does not have

need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. I'm trying to compile it myself, but am up against problems on a processor which does not have floating point capacity. The pre-compiled version above works OK, but the one I compile myself either triggers illegal instructions (s

Re: need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +1000, John August wrote: > I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. > I'm trying to compile it myself, but am > up against problems on a processor which does not have floating point > capacity. The pre-compiled version > above works O

Bug#212462: marked as done (INIT doesnt start with 2.5 kernel)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:37:48 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212462: INIT doesnt start with 2.5 kernel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#212285: marked as done (libc apt-get upgrade bug)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212285: libc apt-get upgrade bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

need fp-less config for libc-2.3.2-7

I'm in need of the configuration for the libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb file. I'm trying to compile it myself, but am up against problems on a processor which does not have floating point capacity. The pre-compiled version above works OK, but the one I compile myself either triggers illegal instructions (s

Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 161: elf_get_dynamic_info: Assertion `info[15] == ((void *)0)' failed!

I understand this list is for discussion of Debian packaging of the GNU C library. My question is not related to the Debian-ized or Debian-patched version of glibc. Nevertheless, my issue may have been encountered by a glibc packager. I have been unable to get assistance from quiet bug-glibc list.

Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 161: elf_get_dynamic_info: Assertion `info[15] == ((void *)0)' failed!

I understand this list is for discussion of Debian packaging of the GNU C library. My question is not related to the Debian-ized or Debian-patched version of glibc. Nevertheless, my issue may have been encountered by a glibc packager. I have been unable to get assistance from quiet bug-glibc list.

Re: libc6 and recent testing upgrades

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:47:12PM +1000, Ian Charles wrote: > Shortly after, I noticed things like /bin/ls, /usr/bin/tar, and other > utilities failing. > The only thing different about my system is that I am running XFS 1.1 > and a patched XFS kernel. I don't know of any of the glibc folks run

libc6 and recent testing upgrades

Hi, I'm not confident enough to submit this as a bug report, so I thought I would post these comments to the maintainers list here. Please forward this to relevent person/party if I've sent this to the wrong place :-( I'm currently running testing (i386). On Friday last week I did an apt-get upd

Bug#212541: This has already been reported

severity 208428 critical tags 208428 sarge sid merge 208428 212541 thanks Sorry, this has already been reported. I did not find the bug report because I did not look at severities below important... Stefan

Bug#208428: Workaround does not appear to work

I tried this workaround, but it does not work correctly. [EMAIL PROTECTED] hupp]0$ groups hupp hupp : upluser oldcoord cgi hsp2 pbs cold cvsusers friend [EMAIL PROTECTED] hupp]0$ getent group friend friend:x:10054:ftp It looks like breaking up the groups line will only give you the first entry.

Re: libc6 and recent testing upgrades

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:47:12PM +1000, Ian Charles wrote: > Shortly after, I noticed things like /bin/ls, /usr/bin/tar, and other > utilities failing. > The only thing different about my system is that I am running XFS 1.1 > and a patched XFS kernel. I don't know of any of the glibc folks run

libc6 and recent testing upgrades

Hi, I'm not confident enough to submit this as a bug report, so I thought I would post these comments to the maintainers list here. Please forward this to relevent person/party if I've sent this to the wrong place :-( I'm currently running testing (i386). On Friday last week I did an apt-get upd

Bug#212541: This has already been reported

severity 208428 critical tags 208428 sarge sid merge 208428 212541 thanks Sorry, this has already been reported. I did not find the bug report because I did not look at severities below important... Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#208428: Workaround does not appear to work

I tried this workaround, but it does not work correctly. [EMAIL PROTECTED] hupp]0$ groups hupp hupp : upluser oldcoord cgi hsp2 pbs cold cvsusers friend [EMAIL PROTECTED] hupp]0$ getent group friend friend:x:10054:ftp It looks like breaking up the groups line will only give you the first entry.

Bug#212697: static linking with lpthread and system call causes crash

Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.2.5-11.2 Description: a system function call within a pthread (when statically linked) ends the program but leaves the processus zombified The same problem does not occur on unstable systems (with libc6 2.3.2-4) Here is a test program that demonstrates the problem, i

Bug#212697: static linking with lpthread and system call causes crash

Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.2.5-11.2 Description: a system function call within a pthread (when statically linked) ends the program but leaves the processus zombified The same problem does not occur on unstable systems (with libc6 2.3.2-4) Here is a test program that demonstrates the problem, i

Bug#212654: glibc should build-depend on bzip2

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:40:54AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: > Package: glibc > Version: 2.3.2-8 > > If I do >apt-get source glibc >cd glibc-2.3.2 >debuild > > I see: > I: Unpacking glibc-2.3.2.tar.bz2 as glibc-2.3.2 in temp-unpack/. > prep.sh: line 17: bzcat: command not found >

Bug#212654: glibc should build-depend on bzip2

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:40:54AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: > Package: glibc > Version: 2.3.2-8 > > If I do >apt-get source glibc >cd glibc-2.3.2 >debuild > > I see: > I: Unpacking glibc-2.3.2.tar.bz2 as glibc-2.3.2 in temp-unpack/. > prep.sh: line 17: bzcat: command not found >

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 22 21:16:58 MDT 2003 Log Message: Yet more nptl stuff Files: added: Tag: nptl glibc-docs.info glibc-docs.manpages libc6-dev.install libc6-dev.manpages libc6-dev.postinst libc6.install libc6.links libc6.manpages local

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 22 21:14:10 MDT 2003 Log Message: ntpl TODO Files: added: Tag: nptl TODO

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/rules.d by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 22 21:10:42 MDT 2003 Log Message: More nptl updates Files: changed:Tag: nptl build.mk debhelper.mk tarball.mk

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 22 21:10:41 MDT 2003 Log Message: More nptl updates Files: changed:Tag: nptl rules

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 22 21:06:39 MDT 2003 Log Message: Use 00list instead of 0list, update to recent CVS for nptl Files: changed:Tag: nptl 10_cvs.dpatch added: Tag: nptl 00list