Bug#192091: ssh: Ip Address assumptions (10.7 -> 10.0.0.7) changed

2003-09-29 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > reassign 192091 glibc > thanks > > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:59:29PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Package: ssh > > Version: 1:3.6.1p1-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Previously I could "ssh 10.7" and connect to the host 10.0.0.7. No

Bug#213384: libc6 2.3.2 causes wine-based programs to segfault on startup

2003-09-29 Thread Ian Ward
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-8 After upgrading to libc6 2.3.2-5 I found that I could no longer start CorelDRAW 9 or Crossover Plugin 1.1.3 plugin setup or loki uninstall binary These programs give no helpful error messages, and aren't open source, so there isn't much I can say other than that Co

Bug#192091: ssh: Ip Address assumptions (10.7 -> 10.0.0.7) changed

2003-09-29 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > reassign 192091 glibc > thanks > > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:59:29PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Package: ssh > > Version: 1:3.6.1p1-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Previously I could "ssh 10.7" and connect to the host 10.0.0.7. No

Bug#212654: glibc should build-depend on bzip2

2003-09-29 Thread Joey Hess
Colin Watson wrote: > I don't know why dpkg-buildpackage didn't check that for you. Possibly because it is currently broken, although I have not checked if the bug is triggered by glibc's control file. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#213384: libc6 2.3.2 causes wine-based programs to segfault on startup

2003-09-29 Thread Ian Ward
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-8 After upgrading to libc6 2.3.2-5 I found that I could no longer start CorelDRAW 9 or Crossover Plugin 1.1.3 plugin setup or loki uninstall binary These programs give no helpful error messages, and aren't open source, so there isn't much I can say other than that Co

Bug#212048: When glibc is compiled with newer binutils static C++ programs will segfault

2003-09-29 Thread Christian Leber
Hello first: it really seems to be a binutils problem It's regarding this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=212048 but doesn't depends on debian, i have binutils, gcc and glibc from cvs #include #include using namespace std; int func() { syslog(LOG_INFO,"",""); } int

Bug#212654: glibc should build-depend on bzip2

2003-09-29 Thread Joey Hess
Colin Watson wrote: > I don't know why dpkg-buildpackage didn't check that for you. Possibly because it is currently broken, although I have not checked if the bug is triggered by glibc's control file. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#212048: When glibc is compiled with newer binutils static C++ programs will segfault

2003-09-29 Thread Christian Leber
Hello first: it really seems to be a binutils problem It's regarding this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=212048 but doesn't depends on debian, i have binutils, gcc and glibc from cvs #include #include using namespace std; int func() { syslog(LOG_INFO,"",""); } int

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2003-09-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 29 13:29:41 MDT 2003 Log Message: update TODO Files: changed:Tag: nptl TODO

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2003-09-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Mon Sep 29 13:29:41 MDT 2003 Log Message: update TODO Files: changed:Tag: nptl TODO -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> > I still think that skiping a supported architecture, as well as the ground > > rule > > about syncing everything before allowing a package to slide down to > > testing, is > > a REALLY bad idea, especialy for something so fundamental as glibc. > > You are _so_ welcome to fix the problem. It

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> > I still think that skiping a supported architecture, as well as the ground rule > > about syncing everything before allowing a package to slide down to testing, is > > a REALLY bad idea, especialy for something so fundamental as glibc. > > You are _so_ welcome to fix the problem. It's impract

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:42:45AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > I still think that skiping a supported architecture, as well as > > > the ground rule about syncing every

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:05:11AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > > Package: locales > > > > Version: 2.3.1-16 > > > >

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:42:45AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > I still think that skiping a supported architecture, as well as > > > the ground rule about syncing every

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:05:11AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > > Package: locales > > > > Version: 2.3.1-16 > > > >

Bug#205691: HPPA: dependencies broken BOTH in testing and unstable

2003-09-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > > Oddly enough, we aren't idiots: this was deliberate. The release > > manager was perfectly aware that hppa was out of sync. However, a > > huge amount of other stuff was waiting for gl