On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The amd64 port is currently providing 32-bit libraries via the ia32-libs
package. This package was originally designed for ia64, and thus install
32-bit libraries in /emul/ia32-linux/ . This is not compliant with the
FHS for
Hi,
I've got a PC with Windows XP, with a NTFS hard
disk. Like before, I made a Linux ext2 partition where I installed Debian (
along with a swap linux partition).
The problem is that when I tryed to run a program
in Debian that would write to the disk, I found out that I only had read-only
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:25:34AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Anyway, my problem is that the fact that these two errors are
the same is causing my code to break very badly. I have a
library that contains its own error codes that will be negative
if casted to an int. Additionally, I want
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the concensus that exists is around FHS compliance.
While I personally consider
Hi,
Attached is an updated Danish translatino for glibc.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-20 23:31:41]:
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
glibc. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked fuzzy in your
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the
Kurt Roeckx writes:
In the end, I'd like to get rid of ia32-libs, and have it be a
dummy package. But on the other hand, I don't want to make a
biarch version of things like the X libraries.
you can't get rid of it on ia64 unless you either drop the 32bit
support or else you provide a
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:27:03PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
glibc. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked fuzzy in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you
On 2006-02-20 (Mon), at 22:27:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for glibc.
[...]
Updated file is attached to this e-mail.
-Choices: ${locales}
+__Choices: All locales, ${locales}
Are you sure this ${locales} should be marked for
hi,
the new portuguese translation for glibc 2.3.6-2 in attach
$ msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
10 translated messages.
best regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
glibc. The English template has been changed, and now
Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 07:51 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Brian M. Carlson a écrit :
# bcc'd to control
forwarded 227386 http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
thanks, control, and have a nice day
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The problem
13 matches
Mail list logo
