Re: For those who care about stable updates (update)

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 06:26:40PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: we are aiming to release the second update to Debian 3.1 sarge (3.1r2) as soon as possible. Current plan is to do it within the next 4 weeks. Shall we try to get the timezone data update in there? Do you want me to prepare it

Re[1]:

Hey whats up, Your own private ph@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - on the Internet We are your solution for Substantial Pres_cr!pt!0n Deals. copy the address below and paste in u your web browser:

Re: Glibc 2.4 development branch for debian-glibc package

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:47:54PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: I've uploaded 2.4 (as 2.3.999, so that we can roll a new tarball for 2.4 if necessary) so that we can all work from the same .orig.tar.gz. Your glibc-libidn-2.4.tar.bz2 differs from upstream, is this intentional? Denis -- To

problem compiling with pthread_setaffinity_np()

Hello, I am trying to compile a program using the non-portable (np) pthread_setaffinity_np() call and I am running into problems with glibc. With LinuxThreads, the call is not defined (as expected): gcc -Wall -O2 -g -pthread -D_GNU_SOURCE -c test.c test.c: In function 'pfms_thread_mainloop':

Bug #355099: kdelibs FTBFS

After some investigation of the failure of kdelibs to build, I found it appears to be a bug in either libtool, ld, or the dynamic linker, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers of those packages. The problem is that lt-meinproc is getting linked with a NEEDED entry pointing to libkdecore.so because it

r1285 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches

Author: barbier Date: 2006-03-10 13:51:51 + (Fri, 10 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1285 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/strfmon.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: * Add strfmon.diff: the negative sign is not

Bug#303920: marked as done (libc6: Nicaragua introduces DST at 12:00pm 09/04/2005)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:08:13 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#318866: marked as done (csu/Makefile uses unspecified echo behavior)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:23:45 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

r1286 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches

Author: aurel32 Date: 2006-03-10 16:39:14 + (Fri, 10 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1286 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/argp_h.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: * Add argp_h.diff fixes (Remove __NTH for

r1287 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches

Author: aurel32 Date: 2006-03-10 16:49:44 + (Fri, 10 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1287 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/getcwd_ia64.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: * Add getcwd_ia64.diff (Remove the assertion so

Re: mips(el) n32 and n64 host triplet

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 04:46:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: There are already triplets for this ;-) Take a look at the glibc configuration; I believe you'd want mips64-linux-gnuabi64 et al. I can't find such thing in the glibc? In which file? Sorry, I missed this message (went in the

Re: Bug #355099: kdelibs FTBFS

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:02:04PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: After some investigation of the failure of kdelibs to build, I found it appears to be a bug in either libtool, ld, or the dynamic linker, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers of those packages. The problem is that lt-meinproc is

Re:

Hey whats up, Every producto from us means you get iBar Gain aPrice. Our oRAPlicas are exactly like the real thing. Committed to creating n selling aqu a lity eRe plica aWa tches. Visit us today to aplace your 0r ider.

Bug#356306: glibc: FTBFS on experimental / amd64: biarch i386 failed to build.

Package: glibc Version: 2.3.999-1 Severity: important Hi, Your package failed to build on amd64. The amd64 version seems to have build without problem, but then when it tried to build the i386 version, it failed with the following error: running configure fragment for sysdeps/i386/elf checking

r1288 - glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian

Author: schizo Date: 2006-03-11 00:56:46 + (Sat, 11 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1288 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog Log: reflect r1271 change in changelog - Remove everything to do with nscd_nischeck. Modified:

r1289 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian: . rules.d sysdeps

Author: schizo Date: 2006-03-11 01:02:48 + (Sat, 11 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1289 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/sysdeps/linux.mk

r1290 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian: . patches

Author: schizo Date: 2006-03-11 04:48:13 + (Sat, 11 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1290 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/patches/series Log: re-enable patches for linuxthreads Modified:

r1291 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian: . patches

Author: schizo Date: 2006-03-11 06:14:34 + (Sat, 11 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1291 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/patches/linuxthreads-sizefix.diff Log: - Update linuxthreads-sizefix.diff for 2.4. Modified:

Re: r1291 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian: . patches

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 06:14:37AM +, Clint Adams wrote: +Index: glibc-2.4/linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/bits/pthreadtypes.h +=== +--- glibc-2.4.orig/linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/bits/pthreadtypes.h 2006-03-11