Bug#171851: take a look at your future body

h Life on its own does not just come from anywhere; it has to have an origin. If one dies and l d helps Charlie learn more about himself. Algernon, is a lab animal who also has the www.dukph.org/ht9/ is the store to lose those baby fat strike the same region within a plate.The strength of these

dear friend

I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Hello,As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry forme,because, I believe everyone will die someday. My name isAbdul-Wahab Omar. I a merchant of Omani nationality and i have been diagnosed with Esophagealcancer. It has

Re: glibc 2.3.6 or 2.4 in etch?

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:44:45PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: Roland McGrath wrote in http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available and

glibc 2.3.6-3 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the glibc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.3.5-13 Current version: 2.3.6-3 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. --

r1298 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

Author: barbier Date: 2006-03-19 22:47:44 + (Sun, 19 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1298 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: glibc 2.3.6-4 uploaded Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

r1299 - glibc-package/tags

Author: barbier Date: 2006-03-19 22:51:05 + (Sun, 19 Mar 2006) New Revision: 1299 Added: glibc-package/tags/2.3.6-4/ Log: Tagging glibc 2.3.6-4 Copied: glibc-package/tags/2.3.6-4 (from rev 1298, glibc-package/trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processing of glibc_2.3.6-4_i386.changes

glibc_2.3.6-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.3.6-4.dsc glibc_2.3.6-4.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.3.6-4_all.deb locales_2.3.6-4_all.deb libc6_2.3.6-4_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.3.6-4_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.3.6-4_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.3.6-4_i386.deb

glibc_2.3.6-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.6-4_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.6-4_all.deb glibc_2.3.6-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6-4.diff.gz glibc_2.3.6-4.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6-4.dsc libc6-amd64_2.3.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-amd64_2.3.6-4_i386.deb

Bug#355264: marked as done (argp.h: Inconsistent declaration of argp_usage)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:02:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#355264: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#357390: marked as done (Collating is broken in Czech locales)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#357390: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#357419: marked as done (bits/resource.h doesn't have _RTLIMIT_RTPRIO on mips)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#357419: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

(no subject)

who are you