r1711 - glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian

2006-08-10 Thread Denis Barbier
Author: barbier Date: 2006-08-10 06:30:47 + (Thu, 10 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1711 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules Log: Add a check so that this branch does not accidentally get uploaded into unstable Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules

Re: r1711 - glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian

2006-08-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:30:50AM +, Denis Barbier wrote: Author: barbier Date: 2006-08-10 06:30:47 + (Thu, 10 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1711 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules Log: Add a check so that this branch does not accidentally get uploaded into

Processing of glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.changes

2006-08-10 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb

glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2006-08-10 Thread Debian Installer
Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4_sparc.deb

Bug#382356: glibc: FTBFS on sparc

2006-08-10 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Package: glibc Severity: important Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 Hi, i am opening this bug for documentation reasons. Currently glibc FTBFS on sparc(64?). First investigation showed up it compiles fine with Sarge kernel, but does not with newer kernels.

r1712 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . sysdeps

2006-08-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2006-08-10 19:24:22 + (Thu, 10 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1712 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/ia64.mk glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/powerpc.mk glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/s390.mk Log: *

Processed: Re: Bug#381317: tightvnc_1.2.9-15(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors

2006-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 381317 linux-kernel-headers Bug#381317: tightvnc_1.2.9-15(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors Bug reassigned from package `tightvnc' to `linux-kernel-headers'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: Re: Bug#382419: vnc4: FTBFS on amd64: # error do_div() does not yet support the C64

2006-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 382419 + help Bug#382419: vnc4: FTBFS on amd64: # error do_div() does not yet support the C64 There were no tags set. Tags added: help reassign 382419 linux-kernel-headers Bug#382419: vnc4: FTBFS on amd64: # error do_div() does not yet support

Re: Bug#382419: vnc4: FTBFS on amd64: # error do_div() does not yet support the C64

2006-08-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
tags 382419 + help reassign 382419 linux-kernel-headers thanks Hi On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:22:32PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: vnc4 Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-11 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following I saw that. I was just about to file a

Re: Bug#381317: tightvnc_1.2.9-15(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors

2006-08-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
reassign 381317 linux-kernel-headers thanks Regards, // Ola On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:37:26AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tightvnc Version: 1.2.9-15 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tightvnc_1.2.9-15 on

r1713 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/all

2006-08-10 Thread Denis Barbier
Author: barbier Date: 2006-08-10 21:27:35 + (Thu, 10 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1713 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/all/submitted-uninitialized-byte-LC_CTYPE.diff Log: Richard Sandiford sent a more complete patch to BZ3013, more errors are caught in locale files with respect to

r1715 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in

2006-08-10 Thread Denis Barbier
Author: barbier Date: 2006-08-10 22:06:29 + (Thu, 10 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1715 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales-all.prerm Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * debian/debhelper.in/locales-all.prerm: New file, to remove

r1716 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in

2006-08-10 Thread Denis Barbier
Author: barbier Date: 2006-08-10 22:18:17 + (Thu, 10 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1716 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.postinst Log: * debian/debhelper.in/locales.postinst: Pass --no-checks to update-locale to not break

Processed: Re: Bug#365628: postinst fails when LANG doesn't point to a valid locale

2006-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 365628 pending Bug#365628: postinst fails when LANG doesn't point to a valid locale There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#365628: postinst fails when LANG doesn't point to a valid locale

2006-08-10 Thread Denis Barbier
tags 365628 pending thanks On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:38:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:55:09AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: AIUI, the checks update-locale is expected to do (and those --no-checks avoids) are the ones passed as arguments (ala update-locale

Bug#376056: marked as done (/usr/bin/localedef also in libc6)

2006-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:11:13 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#376056: /usr/bin/localedef also in libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#382356: glibc: FTBFS on sparc

2006-08-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:56:47PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:50:26PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Package: glibc Severity: important Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 Hi, i am opening this bug for documentation reasons. Currently glibc FTBFS on