r2069 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any

2007-04-15 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Author: madcoder Date: 2007-04-15 10:42:32 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2069 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-unistd_h-fsync.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: Closes: #119974 *

Re: Status of the belocs-locales-{bin,data} packages

2007-04-15 Thread Christian Perrier
(keeping belocs-locales-* packages) Does anybody want to maintain these packages? Are there some languages which really need them? Not in D-I supported packages. I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers, however I share your feelings. There is no point in maintaining

Processed: setting package to glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-p

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-pic

Bug#310445: marked as done (libc6: static binary fails with assertion bad dynamic tag)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:08:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#310445: More information needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#330929: marked as done (how can adduser reliably find out wheter nscd is running?)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:01:12 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330929: how can adduser reliably find out wheter nscd is running? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: tagging 203014

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 tags 203014 + wontfix Bug#203014: libc6-dev: Missing libnss_{db,dns,files,compat}.a files in libc6-dev, just add --enable-static-nss to configure params There were no tags set. Tags

Processed: closing 417815

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 close 417815 Bug#417815: libc6: localtime dies with : tzfile.c:544: __tzfile_compute: Assertion `num_types == 1' failed 'close' is deprecated; see

Processed: Bug#119974: Bug confirmed

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 119974 + pending Bug#119974: libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without __USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN Tags were: pending Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#119974: Bug confirmed

2007-04-15 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
tag 119974 + pending thanks I checked in the POSIX doc, FWIW here is what I found: fsync was first introduced it seems as an XOPEN extension. Hence the __USE_XOPEN guard, and defining _XOPEN_SOURCE indeed works. Else, wrt POSIX, fsync last updates are in posix 1003.1-2001. Just saying

Processed: bug 166403 is forwarded to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4342, tagging 166403

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 forwarded 166403 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4342 Bug#166403: libc6: scanf hex float without exponent Forwarded-to-address changed from

Bug#278922: marked as done (libc6-dev: Newer version of sys/queue.h available)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:05:10 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#278922: Definitions missing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: bug 203412 is forwarded to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4364

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 forwarded 203412 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4364 Bug#203412: libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Processed: bug 166403 is forwarded to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4342

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 forwarded 166403 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4342 Bug#166403: libc6: scanf hex float without exponent Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Bug#119974: Bug confirmed

2007-04-15 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
tag 119974 + pending thanks I checked in the POSIX doc, FWIW here is what I found: fsync was first introduced it seems as an XOPEN extension. Hence the __USE_XOPEN guard, and defining _XOPEN_SOURCE indeed works. Else, wrt POSIX, fsync last updates are in posix 1003.1-2001. Just saying

Processed: Re: Bug#119974: Bug confirmed

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 119974 + pending Bug#119974: libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without __USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#325600: New patch idea

2007-04-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hallo Tom, As *reverting* Aurelien's patch does not change anything, I looked into some source codes around sys_wait4 and osf_wait4 (in glibc and kernel). The interesting thing is: Linuxthreads uses osf_wait4 only on alpha, the other architectures uses the sys_wait4 syscall. As linuxthreads is

Processed: bug 119974 is forwarded to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4366

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 forwarded 119974 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4366 Bug#119974: libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without __USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN Noted your

Bug#419344: Debconf script incorrectly returns an error on cancellation

2007-04-15 Thread James Blanford
Package: tzdata Version: 2007e-3 When I run dpkg-reconfigure tzdata but decide to cancel the operation, an error is returned: echo $? 1 But there was no error. I decided to cancel the operation and nothing was changed. That's a success. It should have returned 0. For example, if I run

Processed: bug 415961 is forwarded to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3405

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 forwarded 415961 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3405 Bug#415961: locales: Sorting with pt_BR ignoring spaces - it shouldn't Noted your statement that Bug has been

Bug#419399: glibc: [INTL:it] Italian debconf templates translation

2007-04-15 Thread Luca Monducci
Package: glibc Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hello, please update the Italian debconf templates translation (attached). Regards, Luca glibc_it.po.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#119974: marked as done (libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without __USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:17:02 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#119974: Bug confirmed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

r2070 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any

2007-04-15 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Author: madcoder Date: 2007-04-15 15:21:53 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2070 Removed: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-unistd_h-fsync.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: I mis read the spec. libc is

Processed: Re: de_* locales do not comply with ISO 8601

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 402461 http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=773 Bug#402461: de_* locales do not comply with ISO 8601 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=773. tag 402461 +

Bug#222514: marked as done (libc6-dev: restrict_arr should be #define'd empty if __STRICT_ANSI__ is defined)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:32:38 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#222514: libc6-dev: restrict_arr should be #define'd empty if __STRICT_ANSI__ is defined has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

r2071 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . po

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-15 15:33:13 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2071 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/it.po Log: * Update Italian debconf translation, by Luca Monducci. Closes: #419399. Modified:

Processed: bug 239427 is forwarded to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4368

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 forwarded 239427 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Bug#239427: realpath() incorrectly described in /usr/include/stdlib.h Noted your statement that Bug has been

r2072 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . rules.d

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-15 15:35:40 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2072 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk Log: * Put back ld.so into optimized packages, it can be useful in some cases. Modified:

Bug#419421: libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb provides glibc-2.5.0-0exp2, not glibc-2.5-1

2007-04-15 Thread Tikhon Tarnavski
Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-1 Severity: normal Current version of libc6 package in Debian testing is 2.5-1, but it provides glibc-2.5.0-0exp2, not glibc-2.5-1. For instance, locales_2.5-1_all.deb package depends on glibc-2.5-1, and there are no matching packages in current testing

Bug#419189: Error on installing libc6 2.5-1 - breaks system

2007-04-15 Thread johfel
The point is that your system has very akward things, as what lies in your /lib/tls: * _seems_ to come from a libc 2.3.2; * still has a libc-2.3.6.so too that has not the correct permissions _BUT_ the same size and date as the libc-2.3.2.so (which is completely absurd). *

r2073 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-15 17:11:05 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2073 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst Log: Grammar fixes Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst

Bug#419445: glibc: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation

2007-04-15 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: glibc Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. Thanks for taking care of warning translators before uploading a new version with string changes. It's highly

Please consider interacting with translators when introducing/modifying new debconf templates

2007-04-15 Thread Christian Perrier
(/me grins at glibc maintainers..:-)) Hello, I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this package. I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf templates or modify the existing

r2074 - tzdata/trunk/debian

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-15 18:03:18 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2074 Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog tzdata/trunk/debian/config Log: * Set the old timezone in case of cancellation (closes: bug#419344). Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

Processed: [bts-link] source package glibc

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

Re: Status of the belocs-locales-{bin,data} packages

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Christian Perrier a écrit : (keeping belocs-locales-* packages) Does anybody want to maintain these packages? Are there some languages which really need them? Not in D-I supported packages. I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers, however I share your

[bts-link] source package glibc

2007-04-15 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #119974 # * http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4366 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED #

Bug#419459: Addning info

2007-04-15 Thread Daniel Smolik
Hi, I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug. On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname genthostbyname_r. This function have third argument char buffer. But if this buffer is not correctly aligned (on SPARC / 4 ) program crashed with BUSS ERROR. I

Bug#419459: Addning info

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
severity 419459 important tag 419459 + confirmed found 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6 thanks Daniel Smolik a écrit : Hi, I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug. On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname genthostbyname_r. This function have third argument

Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL

2007-04-15 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-1 Severity: important The new libc6 is uninstallable on systems with kernel 2.4. As there is still many systems which are only efficient with kernle 2.4 this is a very big problem. - -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#419459: Addning info

2007-04-15 Thread Daniel Smolik
Aurelien Jarno napsal(a): severity 419459 important tag 419459 + confirmed found 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6 thanks Daniel Smolik a écrit : Hi, I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug. On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname genthostbyname_r. This

Processed: Re: Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 419467 + wontfix Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: tagging 419467

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 tags 419467 + wontfix Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL Tags were: wontfix upstream Tags added: wontfix End of message, stopping processing

Processed: found 419459 in 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 found 419459 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6 Bug#419459: libc6: buffer in gethostbyname_r on SPARC must be aligned Bug marked as found in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6. End of message, stopping

Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL

2007-04-15 Thread Clint Adams
The new libc6 is uninstallable on systems with kernel 2.4. As there is still many systems which are only efficient with kernle 2.4 this is a very big problem. You may find it more productive to backport the necessary kernel code from 2.6 to 2.4. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#419189: i'd suggest a check

2007-04-15 Thread Peter Green
it seems like it would be a good idea to check for non dpkg owned versions of problem libraries sitting in that directory in the preinst and either aborting the upgrade before the system is left in a badly broken state or moving the files out of the way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: glibc plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-15 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 4/12/07, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also for hppa and glibc 2.6, if we are not able to build it linuxthreads + TLS support, we will have to switch to NPTL, and that *may* mean a libc transition. We are still waiting for more information from the upstream hppa porters. The

Processed: tagging 415870

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 tags 415870 + moreinfo Bug#415870: nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#415870: nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault

2007-04-15 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:31:47PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: nscd Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13 Severity: important File: /usr/sbin/nscd Running nscd -i hosts while the main nscd daemon is running yields # nscd -d 20662: handle_request: request received (Version = 2) from PID 20669

Bug#419480: locales: bad dependency; uninstallable

2007-04-15 Thread Stephen Gran
Package: locales Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious locales Depends line is: Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0 Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux

Bug#419481: libc6 fails to upgrade on AMD64 X2

2007-04-15 Thread Manuel
Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Trying to install the latest libc6 (2.5) I got the following error: (Reading database ... 276412 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-2 (using libc6_2.5-2_amd64.deb)

Processed: Re: Bug#273051: libc6: Memory leak in getpwuid, getgrouplist still reproducible in glibc 2.3.5-12

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 273051 - unreproducible Bug#273051: Memory leak in libc getpwuid() and getgrouplist() Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo Tags removed: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: closing 133971

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 close 133971 Bug#133971: -Weverything gives warnings in the glibc headers 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further

Bug#160683: marked as done (date: long timezone offset sighlently changed)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:34:39 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#160683: date: long timezone offset sighlently changed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#419480: marked as done (locales: bad dependency; uninstallable)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:38:41 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419480: locales: bad dependency; uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#415870: nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault

2007-04-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:31:47PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: nscd Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13 Severity: important File: /usr/sbin/nscd Running nscd -i hosts while the main nscd daemon is running yields # nscd -d 20662: handle_request: request received (Version

Bug#419481: libc6 fails to upgrade on AMD64 X2

2007-04-15 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:28:29AM +0200, Manuel wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Trying to install the latest libc6 (2.5) I got the following error: (Reading database ... 276412 files and directories currently installed.)

r2077 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in debhelper.in rules.d

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-15 23:36:50 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2077 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales-all.postinst

Bug#415870: marked as done (nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:50:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#415870: nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#419481: marked as done (libc6 fails to upgrade on AMD64 X2)

2007-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:57:50 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419481: libc6 fails to upgrade on AMD64 X2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

r2078 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-16 00:03:20 + (Mon, 16 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2078 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk Log: Actually specify the compress-program Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk

Bug#418813: locales still won't install. Dependency problem on i386

2007-04-15 Thread Selim T. Erdogan
The last message I saw on the bug page mentioned that the glibc-2.5-1 virtual package is provided by libc6 2.5-2. But I've just done a system update (on unstable) and the available version of libc6 is 2.5-1. Furthermore, according to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libc6, 2.5-2 is