Author: madcoder
Date: 2007-04-15 10:42:32 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2069
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-unistd_h-fsync.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
Log:
Closes: #119974
*
(keeping belocs-locales-* packages)
Does anybody want to maintain these packages?
Are there some languages which really need them?
Not in D-I supported packages.
I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers,
however I share your feelings. There is no point in maintaining
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386
libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3
libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-pic
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:08:42 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#310445: More information needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:01:12 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330929: how can adduser reliably find out wheter nscd is
running?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 203014 + wontfix
Bug#203014: libc6-dev: Missing libnss_{db,dns,files,compat}.a files in
libc6-dev, just add --enable-static-nss to configure params
There were no tags set.
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
close 417815
Bug#417815: libc6: localtime dies with : tzfile.c:544: __tzfile_compute:
Assertion `num_types == 1' failed
'close' is deprecated; see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 119974 + pending
Bug#119974: libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without
__USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tag 119974 + pending
thanks
I checked in the POSIX doc, FWIW here is what I found:
fsync was first introduced it seems as an XOPEN extension. Hence the
__USE_XOPEN guard, and defining _XOPEN_SOURCE indeed works.
Else, wrt POSIX, fsync last updates are in posix 1003.1-2001.
Just saying
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
forwarded 166403 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4342
Bug#166403: libc6: scanf hex float without exponent
Forwarded-to-address changed from
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:05:10 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#278922: Definitions missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
forwarded 203412 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4364
Bug#203412: libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
forwarded 166403 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4342
Bug#166403: libc6: scanf hex float without exponent
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
tag 119974 + pending
thanks
I checked in the POSIX doc, FWIW here is what I found:
fsync was first introduced it seems as an XOPEN extension. Hence the
__USE_XOPEN guard, and defining _XOPEN_SOURCE indeed works.
Else, wrt POSIX, fsync last updates are in posix 1003.1-2001.
Just saying
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 119974 + pending
Bug#119974: libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without
__USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Hallo Tom,
As *reverting* Aurelien's patch does not change anything, I looked into some
source codes around sys_wait4 and osf_wait4 (in glibc and kernel). The
interesting thing is:
Linuxthreads uses osf_wait4 only on alpha, the other architectures uses the
sys_wait4 syscall. As linuxthreads is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
forwarded 119974 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4366
Bug#119974: libc6-dev: fsync() doesn't get declared on unistd.h without
__USE_BSD or __USE_XOPEN
Noted your
Package: tzdata
Version: 2007e-3
When I run dpkg-reconfigure tzdata but decide to cancel the operation,
an error is returned:
echo $?
1
But there was no error. I decided to cancel the operation and nothing
was changed. That's a success. It should have returned 0.
For example, if I run
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
forwarded 415961 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3405
Bug#415961: locales: Sorting with pt_BR ignoring spaces - it shouldn't
Noted your statement that Bug has been
Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch
Hello,
please update the Italian debconf templates translation (attached).
Regards,
Luca
glibc_it.po.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:17:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#119974: Bug confirmed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Author: madcoder
Date: 2007-04-15 15:21:53 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2070
Removed:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-unistd_h-fsync.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
Log:
I mis read the spec. libc is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 402461 http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=773
Bug#402461: de_* locales do not comply with ISO 8601
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=773.
tag 402461 +
Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:32:38 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#222514: libc6-dev: restrict_arr should be #define'd empty
if __STRICT_ANSI__ is defined
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-15 15:33:13 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2071
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/it.po
Log:
* Update Italian debconf translation, by Luca Monducci. Closes: #419399.
Modified:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
forwarded 239427 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
Bug#239427: realpath() incorrectly described in /usr/include/stdlib.h
Noted your statement that Bug has been
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-15 15:35:40 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2072
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk
Log:
* Put back ld.so into optimized packages, it can be useful in some cases.
Modified:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: normal
Current version of libc6 package in Debian testing is 2.5-1, but it
provides glibc-2.5.0-0exp2, not glibc-2.5-1. For instance,
locales_2.5-1_all.deb package depends on glibc-2.5-1, and there are no
matching packages in current testing
The point is that your system has very akward things, as what lies in
your /lib/tls:
* _seems_ to come from a libc 2.3.2;
* still has a libc-2.3.6.so too that has not the correct permissions
_BUT_ the same size and date as the libc-2.3.2.so (which is
completely absurd).
*
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-15 17:11:05 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2073
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
Log:
Grammar fixes
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst
Package: glibc
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the
debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
Thanks for taking care of warning translators before uploading a new
version with string changes. It's highly
(/me grins at glibc maintainers..:-))
Hello,
I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this
package.
I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates
review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf
templates or modify the existing
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-15 18:03:18 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2074
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
tzdata/trunk/debian/config
Log:
* Set the old timezone in case of cancellation (closes: bug#419344).
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report for
Christian Perrier a écrit :
(keeping belocs-locales-* packages)
Does anybody want to maintain these packages?
Are there some languages which really need them?
Not in D-I supported packages.
I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers,
however I share your
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #119974
# * http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4366
# * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED
#
Hi,
I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug.
On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname
genthostbyname_r. This function have third argument char buffer. But if
this buffer is not correctly aligned (on SPARC / 4 ) program crashed
with BUSS ERROR. I
severity 419459 important
tag 419459 + confirmed
found 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6
thanks
Daniel Smolik a écrit :
Hi,
I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug.
On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname
genthostbyname_r. This function have third argument
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: important
The new libc6 is uninstallable on systems with kernel 2.4. As there is
still many systems which are only efficient with kernle 2.4 this is a
very big problem.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
Aurelien Jarno napsal(a):
severity 419459 important
tag 419459 + confirmed
found 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6
thanks
Daniel Smolik a écrit :
Hi,
I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug.
On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname
genthostbyname_r. This
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 419467 + wontfix
Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 419467 + wontfix
Bug#419467: New version uninstallable on kernel 2.4 systems because NPTL
Tags were: wontfix upstream
Tags added: wontfix
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
found 419459 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6
Bug#419459: libc6: buffer in gethostbyname_r on SPARC must be aligned
Bug marked as found in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6.
End of message, stopping
The new libc6 is uninstallable on systems with kernel 2.4. As there is
still many systems which are only efficient with kernle 2.4 this is a
very big problem.
You may find it more productive to backport the necessary kernel code
from 2.6 to 2.4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it seems like it would be a good idea to check for non dpkg owned versions
of problem libraries sitting in that directory in the preinst and either
aborting the upgrade before the system is left in a badly broken state or
moving the files out of the way.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 4/12/07, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also for hppa and glibc 2.6, if we are not able to build it linuxthreads
+ TLS support, we will have to switch to NPTL, and that *may* mean a
libc transition. We are still waiting for more information from the
upstream hppa porters.
The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 415870 + moreinfo
Bug#415870: nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:31:47PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: nscd
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13
Severity: important
File: /usr/sbin/nscd
Running nscd -i hosts while the main nscd daemon is running yields
# nscd -d
20662: handle_request: request received (Version = 2) from PID 20669
Package: locales
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: serious
locales Depends line is:
Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Trying to install the latest libc6 (2.5) I got the following error:
(Reading database ... 276412 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-2 (using libc6_2.5-2_amd64.deb)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 273051 - unreproducible
Bug#273051: Memory leak in libc getpwuid() and getgrouplist()
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
close 133971
Bug#133971: -Weverything gives warnings in the glibc headers
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:34:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#160683: date: long timezone offset sighlently changed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:38:41 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#419480: locales: bad dependency; uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:31:47PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: nscd
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13
Severity: important
File: /usr/sbin/nscd
Running nscd -i hosts while the main nscd daemon is running yields
# nscd -d
20662: handle_request: request received (Version
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:28:29AM +0200, Manuel wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Trying to install the latest libc6 (2.5) I got the following error:
(Reading database ... 276412 files and directories currently installed.)
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-15 23:36:50 + (Sun, 15 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2077
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales-all.postinst
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:50:42 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#415870: nscd -i hosts causes main nscd daemon to segfault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:57:50 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#419481: libc6 fails to upgrade on AMD64 X2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-16 00:03:20 + (Mon, 16 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2078
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk
Log:
Actually specify the compress-program
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk
The last message I saw on the bug page mentioned that the glibc-2.5-1
virtual package is provided by libc6 2.5-2. But I've just done a system
update (on unstable) and the available version of libc6 is 2.5-1.
Furthermore, according to
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libc6,
2.5-2 is
61 matches
Mail list logo