r2092 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 05:46:44 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2092 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: #419879 actually looks like a different problem Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog

r2093 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 05:50:03 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2093 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/first_weekday.diff Log: * patches/localedata/first_weekday.diff: Add first_workday for *_NO and *_DK.

r2094 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 05:56:17 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2094 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Upload to unstable Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

Processing of glibc_2.5-3_amd64.changes

glibc_2.5-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.5-3.dsc glibc_2.5-3.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.5-3_all.deb locales_2.5-3_all.deb libc6_2.5-3_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.5-3_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.5-3_amd64.deb

glibc_2.5-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: glibc-doc_2.5-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.5-3_all.deb glibc_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.5-3.diff.gz glibc_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.5-3.dsc libc6-dbg_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.5-3_amd64.deb

glibc override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-i386_2.5-3_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

Bug#334339: marked as done (mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an UltraSPARC client (bus error))

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419459: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419399: marked as done (glibc: [INTL:it] Italian debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419399: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419189: marked as done (Error on installing libc6 2.5-1 - breaks system)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419189: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419459: marked as done (libc6: buffer in gethostbyname_r on SPARC must be aligned )

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419459: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#413471: marked as done (gethostbyname_r on Sparc has alignement bug that crashes MySQL)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419459: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419729: marked as done ([INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419729: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419445: marked as done (glibc: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419445: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#203412: marked as done (libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#203412: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#234880: marked as done (glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#234880: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#379100: marked as done (locales: Missing first_workday in *_NO and *_DK)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379100: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419036: marked as done (Kernel panic - attempted to kill init!)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419036: fixed in glibc 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: reopen 310445

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 310445 please document that static linking is unsupported Bug#310445: libc6: static binary fails with assertion bad dynamic tag Changed Bug title to please document that static linking is unsupported from libc6: static binary fails with

Bug#310445: closed by Pierre HABOUZIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#310445: More information needed)

* static linking against libc is frowned upon, and mostly unsupported upstream. This is something I was not aware of and should be mentioned in the libc6-dev package description. -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#415573: libc6: uninitialised value in manager.c:128

Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: [..] Does it still apply to glibc2.5 currently in unstable ? It seems to be fine for glibc2.5, thanks for the fixup. Greets, Jeroen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

r2095 - glibc-package/tags

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 12:42:07 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2095 Added: glibc-package/tags/2.5-3/ Log: Tagging 2.5-3 Copied: glibc-package/tags/2.5-3 (from rev 2094, glibc-package/trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

r2096 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . rules.d

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 12:44:01 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2096 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk Log: * debian/rules.d/build.mk: fix the testsuite workaround on the MIPS SB1 platform. Modified:

Bug#415573: marked as done (libc6: uninitialised value in manager.c:128)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:26:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#415573: libc6: uninitialised value in manager.c:128 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#378191: locales-all still ship README.Debian

found 378191 2.5-3 quit Hello GNU Libc Maintainers, locales-all still include the file /usr/share/doc/locales-all/README.Debian which was supposed to be removed in version 2.3.6-16 Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Processed: locales-all still ship README.Debian

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 378191 2.5-3 Bug#378191: locales-all: Documentation is misleading Bug marked as found in version 2.5-3. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#325600: Patch for buggy pthreads on stable found

I forgot to mention: Someone could try to enable the test suite on package build again. Now the linuxthreads testcases should pass... This can be enabled by changing debian/sysdeps/alpha.mk ! I will not do this as the package build takes too long on my machine and I do not want wait 3.5 hours

Bug#325600: Patch for buggy pthreads on stable found

Tags: patch I created a patch for glibc (version 2.3.6.ds1) that fixes the zombie processes bug. It uses an ifdef'ed version of the waitpid_not_cancel macro that uses on alpha the standard wait4 syscall instead of an inline syscall. All other architectures are not changed. I put the attached

Processed: tags

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 325600 + patch Bug#325600: libc6.1: Threads remain defunct on Alpha with libc6. 2.3.5-4 Tags were: fixed-in-experimental Tags added: patch quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#325600: Patch for buggy pthreads on stable found

Hi again, I forgot to mention: Someone could try to enable the test suite on package build again. Now the linuxthreads testcases should pass... This can be enabled by changing debian/sysdeps/alpha.mk ! I will not do this as the package build takes too long on my machine and I do not

Bug#378191: locales-all still ship README.Debian

Bill Allombert a écrit : found 378191 2.5-3 quit Hello GNU Libc Maintainers, locales-all still include the file /usr/share/doc/locales-all/README.Debian which was supposed to be removed in version 2.3.6-16 Oops, it looks like this file was never deleted from the 2.5 branch, and thus

r2097 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 22:00:49 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2097 Removed: glibc-package/trunk/debian/locales-all.README.Debian Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * debian/locales-all.README.Debian: Remove again, it is useless now. (Closes:

Bug#325600: Patch for buggy pthreads on stable found

Uwe Schindler a écrit : Tags: patch I created a patch for glibc (version 2.3.6.ds1) that fixes the zombie processes bug. It uses an ifdef'ed version of the waitpid_not_cancel macro that uses on alpha the standard wait4 syscall instead of an inline syscall. All other architectures are not

Bug#325600: Patch for buggy pthreads on stable found

Uwe Schindler a écrit : Hi again, I forgot to mention: Someone could try to enable the test suite on package build again. Now the linuxthreads testcases should pass... This can be enabled by changing debian/sysdeps/alpha.mk ! I will not do this as the package build takes too long on my

[etch r1] glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13etch1

Hi all, We would like to make an upload of the glibc package to etch to fix a few issues that we find important enough to get them fixed. Please find below the current changelog of our etch branch. Is it ok to upload it? Bye, Aurelien glibc (2.3.6.ds1-13etch1) stable; urgency=low [ Pierre

r2098 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-etch/debian: . patches patches/alpha

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 22:11:52 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2098 Added: glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-etch/debian/patches/alpha/local-waitpid-not-cancel.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-etch/debian/changelog

Bug#419879: libc6 upgrade error

Ohba Yoshihiro a écrit : Thank you for the response. Here is output of 'ls -l /lib/tls' and content of /var/log/dpkg.log. BTW, I run mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.old' and then tried upgrade again, but I encountered the same error. Maybe I missed something to do. Oh, your problem looks a bit

r2099 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 22:39:13 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2099 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst Log: * debhelper.in/libc.preinst: use dpkg-query instead of looking into /var/lib/dpkg/info. Thanks

Re: [ITR] templates://tzdata/{templates}

Christian Perrier a écrit : Dear Debian maintainer, The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf templates used in tzdata. This review takes place for all packages that use debconf to interact with users and its

r2100 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/mips

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-19 23:13:33 + (Thu, 19 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2100 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/mips/cvs-ldsodefs_h.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: * patches/mips/cvs-ldsodefs_h.diff: new

Re: [etch r1] glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13etch1

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:29:12AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: We would like to make an upload of the glibc package to etch to fix a few issues that we find important enough to get them fixed. Please find below the current changelog of our etch branch. Is it ok to upload it? *

Bug#419189: not due to ubuntu or knoppix

I do not believe the problem just stems from having foreign libraries in it, as my system is stock Debian and I have a similar problem.No Ubuntu, no knoppix, just straight Debian. apt-get install (some packages) which pulled in a new libc, I think. Now I get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mutt

Bug#419879: libc6 upgrade error

Here is my 'ls -l /lib' output. --- total 4836 drwxr-xr-x 16 root root8192 Apr 19 00:10 ./ drwxr-xr-x 23 root root4096 Mar 11 00:29 ../ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Mar 11 00:27 brltty/ lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21 Jan 6 23:57 cpp - /etc/alternatives/cpp* drwxr-xr-x 2 root root