Thomas Krichel a écrit :
[...]
fasolt:/lib# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/lib/ld-linux-2.5.so:/usr/lib:/lib
having /lib/ld-linux-2.5.so in LD_LIBRARY_PATH is wrong.
fasolt:/lib# ls
Floating point exception
fasolt:/lib# dselect
Illegal instruction
fasolt:/lib# find
Segmentation fault
reassign 427398 linux-2.6
retitle 427398 scandir syscall broken on hppa
thanks
John David Anglin a écrit :
A patch for this problem was posted here:
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2007-June/031690.html
However, it's likely that the parisc specific code will be removed
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:42:50 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#428434: libc6: Resolver prefers IPv4 to IPv6 in some cases
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 427398 linux-2.6
Bug#427398: svn is broken after updating ro libc6 2.5-9
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `linux-2.6'.
retitle 427398 scandir syscall broken on hppa
Bug#427398: svn is broken after updating ro libc6 2.5-9
Changed Bug
Aurelien Jarno writes
It depends if you still have an old version of the library
installed. It looks like that you were able to install the new
version with dselect, the old version has probably been removed.
Thank you. I lost my root window through my own stupidity.
My friends in NYC
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-06-13 09:33:39 + (Wed, 13 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 2364
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Upload to unstable
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
---
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:47:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#427990: fixed in glibc 2.5-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:47:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#427416: fixed in glibc 2.5-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If you currently have an old libc6 version (eg: 2.3.6.ds1-13) kernel
(eg: 2.4.20-686) installed, then it is impossible to upgrade libc6 or the
kernel.
When you attempt to upgrade libc6, the preinst
Thanks for your reply.
Yes it's possible. Users are supposed to have a kernel 2.6 when they
run etch. For user that lived up to here with a 2.4 kernel (wow!) then
the fix is to install etch's 2.6 kernel, then to upgrade to
unstable/lenny.
I think it would be best if I gave you some more
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:44:25PM +0200, David Purdy wrote:
I could add another hack.. like disable that libc6 check
You don't want to do that. It's there for a reason; if you override
the check, absolutely nothing will run.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:18:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
For user that lived up to here with a 2.4 kernel (wow!) then the fix
is to install etch's 2.6 kernel, then to upgrade to unstable/lenny.
This is the standard upgrade path, and it will work.
Maybe I am repeating
12 matches
Mail list logo
