Touko Korpela a écrit :
> Current conflicts binutils (<< 2.17cvs20070426-1) doesn't match version
> in experimental. Maybe it should be added too?
>
That's really not possible, the version in experimental is higher (from
the debian version point of view) than the version in unstable. If we do
th
Current conflicts binutils (<< 2.17cvs20070426-1) doesn't match version
in experimental. Maybe it should be added too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-headers source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.18-7
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the brit
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-07-12 20:12:22 + (Thu, 12 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 2412
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/script.in/kernelcheck.sh
Log:
* script.in/kernelcheck.sh: the minimum kernel version is now 2.6.8 and not
2.6.1. Closes: bug#
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-07-12 20:09:32 + (Thu, 12 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 2411
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/script.in/kernelcheck.sh
Log:
* script.in/kernelcheck.sh: s/kernel_compare_version/linux_compare_versions/
for arm.
Modifie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> severity 432721 minor
Bug#432721: libc6: preinst kernel check has wrong version number
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386
> libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3
> libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12
15:15 ---
Subject: Bug 4438
CVSROOT:/cvs/glibc
Module name:libc
Branch: glibc-2_5-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 15:15:03
Modified files:
. : Ch
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12
15:14 ---
Subject: Bug 4342
CVSROOT:/cvs/glibc
Module name:libc
Branch: glibc-2_5-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 15:13:48
Modified files:
. : Ch
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12
15:10 ---
Subject: Bug 4368
CVSROOT:/cvs/glibc
Module name:libc
Branch: glibc-2_5-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 15:10:21
Modified files:
. : Ch
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12
15:10 ---
Subject: Bug 4364
CVSROOT:/cvs/glibc
Module name:libc
Branch: glibc-2_5-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 15:09:59
Modified files:
. : Ch
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:30:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425610: locales: dpkg-reconfigure fails: unexpected end of
file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
reassign 432844 lib32z1
forcemerge 432844 432326
kthxbye
I feel tired ...
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 02:38:50PM +0200, BH wrote:
> Package: libc6-i386
> Version: 2.6-2
>
> The packages were broken yesterday, but I tried to wait one day ...
> sems nobody noticed, so I'm reporting this bug. Using
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 432844 lib32z1
Bug#432844: Unable to install libc6-i386 on debian unstable (amd64 arch.)
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-i386' to `lib32z1'.
> forcemerge 432844 432326
Bug#432844: Unable to install libc6-i386 on debian unstable (amd64 arch.
Package: libc6-i386
Version: 2.6-2
The packages were broken yesterday, but I tried to wait one day ...
sems nobody noticed, so I'm reporting this bug. Using debian unstable
on amd64
"apt-get update;apt-get upgrade" followed by "apt-get -f install" end with this:
Preparing to replace libc6-i386
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:16:15PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:11:02AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I am unable to reproduce this bug. Could you please add a -x to the
> > first line of /var/lib/dpkg/info/locales.postinst (after #! /bin/sh) and
> > rerun it again? This
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 432757 lib32z1
Bug#432757: Upgrade is impossible. Conflicts with lib32z1 package
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-i386' to `lib32z1'.
> forcemerge 432757 432326
Bug#432757: Upgrade is impossible. Conflicts with lib32z1 package
Bug#432326: li
reassign 432757 lib32z1
forcemerge 432757 432326
kthxbye
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpkWvhywk9Cw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
18 matches
Mail list logo
