r2786 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/sh4

Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-01-19 12:24:08 + (Sat, 19 Jan 2008) New Revision: 2786 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sh4/cvs-nptl-private-futexes.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: *

Processing of glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_i386.changes

glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5.dsc glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_all.deb locales_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_all.deb libc6_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_i386.deb

Bug#460226: Memory leak in SUNRPC code

On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:27:00PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Hi, On Sat Jan 12, 2008 at 13:41:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi release managers, On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:59:53AM +, Andre Cruz wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2 Severity: serious

Bug#459322: libc6-dev: implementation of pthread_cleanup_pop_restore_np

One last attempt. I've copied the manpage exactly into the code. The manpage says two example codes are functionally equivalent when explaining what pthread_cleanup_push_defer_np and pthread_cleanup_pop_restore_np do. If one uses one of the manpage example codes, everything works in the testcase

glibc override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-amd64_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is

Bug#461008: marked as done (locales: on install, perform locales generation in the background)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:17:43 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461008: locales: on install, perform locales generation in the background has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt