[Bug libc/5507] gai() sorting is broken

2008-02-12 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2008-02-13 00:49 --- This bug is actually fixed in CVS. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

r2813 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

2008-02-12 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-12 23:00:21 + (Tue, 12 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2813 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: New changelog entry Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/tr

Bug#462112: marked as done (libc6 mips needs LL SC WAR for R10k < rev 3.0 )

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#462112: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #462112, regarding libc6 mips needs LL SC WAR for R10k < rev 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#456260: marked as done (libc6.1: ldconfig segfault under LANG=ja_JP.eucJP)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456260: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #456260, regarding libc6.1: ldconfig segfault under LANG=ja_JP.eucJP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#464022: marked as done (nscd: Incorrect init.d script dependencies)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464022: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #464022, regarding nscd: Incorrect init.d script dependencies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#463342: marked as done (libc6-dev: epoll.h doesn't include recent EPOLLRDHUP event type.)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#463342: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #463342, regarding libc6-dev: epoll.h doesn't include recent EPOLLRDHUP event type. to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#464594: marked as done (glibc: ieee754.h uses BIG_ENDIAN instead of __BIG_ENDIAN causing doubles to be mixed up on arm)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464594: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #464594, regarding glibc: ieee754.h uses BIG_ENDIAN instead of __BIG_ENDIAN causing doubles to be mixed up on arm to be marked

Bug#438179: marked as done (Please provide a way to override RFC3484)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#438179: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #438179, regarding Please provide a way to override RFC3484 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#464924: marked as done (glibc: errors during build: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' [...] cannot be preloaded)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464924: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #464924, regarding glibc: errors during build: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' [...] cannot be preloaded to be marked as done. Th

Bug#464395: marked as done (libc6: ld.so manpage out of date (LD_BIND_NOT))

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464395: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #464395, regarding libc6: ld.so manpage out of date (LD_BIND_NOT) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#456779: marked as done (glibc: getaddrinfo() sorting broken)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456779: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #456779, regarding glibc: getaddrinfo() sorting broken to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#453480: marked as done (postinst - Segmentation fault)

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453480: fixed in glibc 2.7-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #453480, regarding postinst - Segmentation fault to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

glibc_2.7-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.7-7_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.7-7_all.deb glibc_2.7-7.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.7-7.diff.gz glibc_2.7-7.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.7-7.dsc libc6-dbg_2.7-7_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.7-7_amd64.deb libc6-dev-i386_2.7-7_amd

glibc override disparity

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-i386_2.7-7_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

Processing of glibc_2.7-7_amd64.changes

2008-02-12 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.7-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.7-7.dsc glibc_2.7-7.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.7-7_all.deb locales_2.7-7_all.deb libc6_2.7-7_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.7-7_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.7-7_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.7-7_amd64.deb locales-all_2.7

Processed: Re: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 438179 libc6 Bug#438179: Please provide a way to override RFC3484 Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `libc6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

r2811 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any

2008-02-12 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-12 21:52:09 + (Tue, 12 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2811 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-rfc3484.diff Log: Add missing parts Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-rfc3484.diff

r2810 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any

2008-02-12 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-12 21:37:08 + (Tue, 12 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2810 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-rfc3484.diff Removed: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-rfc3484-sortv4.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-packag

Processed: tagging 456779

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 456779 + pending Bug#456779: glibc: getaddrinfo() sorting broken There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

r2809 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in local/manpages

2008-02-12 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-12 21:07:55 + (Tue, 12 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2809 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/local/manpages/gai.conf.5 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.manpages Log: * local/manpages/gai.conf.5: new ma

Processed: reopening 456779

2008-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 > reopen 456779 Bug#456779: glibc: getaddrinfo() sorting broken 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed ver

Bug#465427: libc6: strftime gets confused by the invalid format specifier "%20#%"

2008-02-12 Thread Edward Welbourne
Package: libc6 Version: 2.7-6 Severity: minor I used the following program to probe the behaviour of strftime: #include #include const int bufsize = 4096; int main(int count, char *args[]) { char buf[bufsize]; time_t now = time(NULL); struct tm rom, *when = localtime_r