5, 10 oder sogar 25 Kilo abnehmen? Wer will das nicht! Bloss erreicht es
kaum jemand. Zumindest nicht ohne Hilfe.
Das neu entdeckte Mittel ist so revolutionaer, es hat es sogar in die Oprah
Winfrey Show gebracht!
Amerikanische Wunderpillen erzielen den vollkommenen Erfolg. Profitieren
auch Sie
eglibc_2.10.2-9_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
libc6_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-dev_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-prof_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-pic_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
eglibc_2.10.2-9_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libc6_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-dev_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-prof_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-pic_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
locales-all_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.10.2-8
Severity: minor
The INTMAX_MAX definition in /usr/include/stdint.h yields build
failure in 32-bit C90 mode (x86_64 machines with the -m32 gcc
switch and x86 machines).
$ cat intmax-test.c
#include stdint.h
int main (void)
{
intmax_t x;
x = INTMAX_MAX;
Accepted:
libc-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-dbg_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
libc6-dev_2.10.2-9_hppa.deb
to
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
The INTMAX_MAX definition in /usr/include/stdint.h yields build
failure in 32-bit C90 mode (x86_64 machines with the -m32 gcc
switch and x86 machines).
$ cat intmax-test.c
#include stdint.h
int main (void)
{
intmax_t x;
On 2010-05-22 21:36:14 +, Clint Adams wrote:
Is this patch what you want?
No, that would be incorrect, as when __WORDSIZE isn't 64,
/usr/include/stdint.h defines:
__extension__
typedef long long int intmax_t;
__extension__
typedef unsigned long long int uintmax_t;
i.e. intmax_t
The natural approach to fix this would seem to be to use __extension__ in
the definitions of __INT64_C and __UINT64_C and the associated INT64_C
etc. macros, when those use long long suffixes. That should avoid the
failures for strict C90 when using a compiler recent enough to have the
8 matches
Mail list logo
