On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:40:26AM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
I'm unable to run valgrind without renaming /lib/i686
it asserts on:
.../sysdeps/x86_64/cacheinfo.c:255: handle_intel: Assertion `maxidx = 2'
I've
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not consistent. Are you running reportbug on a different
machine?
yes
the problem is on a old amd 800mhz box, but I use a different box
for submitting
do you need some additional
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not consistent. Are you running reportbug on a different
machine?
yes
the problem is on a old amd 800mhz
reassign 584607 binutils-gold
thanks
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 12:02:47AM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
On 6/4/10, Clint Adams sch...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 11:01:11PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wl,--export-dynamic -static
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 584607 binutils-gold
Bug #584607 [libc6] libc6: autoconf configure scripts hang at checking whether
a statically linked program can dlopen itself
Bug reassigned from package 'libc6' to 'binutils-gold'.
Bug No longer marked as found in
On 06/06/2010 14.55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not consistent. Are you running reportbug on a different
machine?
yes
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:27:12PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 14.55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:03:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce it. Tried on an Athlon and on
Opteron CPU.
I am just wondering, what is the version of valgrind, and how exactly do
you trigger the bug (valgrind command line, code, etc.)
--
Aurelien
Author: sthibault
Date: 2010-06-06 22:21:17 + (Sun, 06 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 4326
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/submitted-ttyname.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
On 06/06/2010 23.09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:03:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce it. Tried on an Athlon and on
Opteron CPU.
I am just wondering, what is the version of valgrind, and how exactly do
you trigger the bug
On 06/06/2010 23.09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:03:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce it. Tried on an Athlon and on
Opteron CPU.
I am just wondering, what is the version of valgrind, and how exactly do
you trigger the bug
11 matches
Mail list logo
