Re: RFC: use of shlib bump for libc dependency on new multiarch directories?

2011-02-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Steve Langasek wrote: A virtual package is a good idea, though - in fact, it's such a good idea that I remember now we discussed this back at DebConf and I'd subsequently forgotten about it. Thanks for jogging my memory! :) Yes, whether or not we add support in a

Re: RFC: use of shlib bump for libc dependency on new multiarch directories?

2011-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:55:57PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Steve Langasek wrote: A virtual package is a good idea, though - in fact, it's such a good idea that I remember now we discussed this back at DebConf and I'd subsequently forgotten about it. Thanks for