On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Given the timescales of the upcoming 6.0.2 and the larger-than-usual > > > > size of the diff, we'd prefer to look at getting this uploaded early in > > > > the 6.0.3 cycle, to give us a longer period with the updated version > > > > available for testing. > > > > We're now rather late in the 6.0.3 cycle - in fact, the point release > > should already have happened (there's been a small amount of scheduling > > fail). > > Does it mean we should consider it for the 6.0.4 cycle instead?
That might be a better idea, but possibly depends on when the 6.0.3 release ends up being, which is somewhat up in the air still; sorry for messing you around on this. Hopefully we'll have more of a plan soon. > > > Unfortunately the 2.11.4 release never happened upstream, it's seems to > > > be blocked currently. > > > > Is there any hint as to whether that's likely to be a short-term issue, > > or to persist for some time? > > > Given I haven't got any answer to the mails I sent to the call for > testing thread, I don't expect this issue will be fixed soon. That is rather unfortunate, indeed. :-( Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1314911082.15526.5.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
