Bug#671715: libc6: Fail to upgrade from 2.13-27 to newer version !

2012-05-08 Thread newbeewan
Hi, I have tried that workaround but without any success :( I get the same message : # dpkg -i ./download/libc6_2.13-27_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 81988 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6:amd64 2.13-27 (using .../libc6_2.13-27_amd64.deb) ... A copy of

Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?

2012-05-08 Thread Andreas Jaeger
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working but new programs cannot be linked with the routines in libc anymore.

Bug#671715: libc6: Fail to upgrade from 2.13-27 to newer version !

2012-05-08 Thread Nikolay Kichukov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please, try to downgrade using 'dpkg -i' the following: libc6-dbg_2.13-27_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.13-27_amd64.deb libc6-i386_2.13-27_amd64.deb libc-bin_2.13-27_amd64.deb libc-dev-bin_2.13-27_amd64.deb HTH, - -Nik On 05/08/2012 11:51 AM, newbeewan

Bug#672119: CVE-2011-1658

2012-05-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: eglibc Severity: important Tags: security This appears to be still unfixed in sid: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-1658 These fixes were made for glibc: http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=96611391

Re: Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?

2012-05-08 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL slightly easier until such time as TI-RPC code is further

Bug#671715: libc6: Fail to upgrade from 2.13-27 to newer version !

2012-05-08 Thread newbeewan
Nothing better, all packages downgrade well except lib6 which fails always with the same message ! Mourad Le 08/05/2012 16:34, Nikolay Kichukov a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please, try to downgrade using 'dpkg -i' the following: libc6-dbg_2.13-27_amd64.deb

Re: Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?

2012-05-08 Thread Allan McRae
On 09/05/12 01:44, Jeff Law wrote: On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL slightly easier until

Re: Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?

2012-05-08 Thread Adam Conrad
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:44:15AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL

Re: Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?

2012-05-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted.  Old programs keep working  but new

Re: Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?

2012-05-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working but new