Hi,
I have tried that workaround but without any success :(
I get the same message :
# dpkg -i ./download/libc6_2.13-27_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 81988 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6:amd64 2.13-27 (using .../libc6_2.13-27_amd64.deb) ...
A copy of
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution
maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16:
* The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working
but new programs cannot be linked with the routines in libc anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, try to downgrade using 'dpkg -i' the following:
libc6-dbg_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc-bin_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.13-27_amd64.deb
HTH,
- -Nik
On 05/08/2012 11:51 AM, newbeewan
Package: eglibc
Severity: important
Tags: security
This appears to be still unfixed in sid:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-1658
These fixes were made for glibc:
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=96611391
On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution
maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16:
It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL slightly easier until such
time as TI-RPC code is further
Nothing better, all packages downgrade well except lib6 which fails always with the same
message !
Mourad
Le 08/05/2012 16:34, Nikolay Kichukov a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, try to downgrade using 'dpkg -i' the following:
libc6-dbg_2.13-27_amd64.deb
On 09/05/12 01:44, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution
maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc
2.16:
It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL slightly easier until
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:44:15AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution
maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16:
It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution
maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16:
* The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working
but new
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution
maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16:
* The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working
but new
10 matches
Mail list logo