Bug#555168: Fwd: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, for the record. Helge - Forwarded message from \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com - Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:23:56 +0100 From: \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com To: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de CC: dwa...@translate.org.za Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; af; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays. I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales subsequently. Regards. Op 07/06/2012 18:51, het Helge Kreutzmann geskryf: Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s): en_BW en_ZW These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge - End forwarded message - -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Schalk, thanks for your quick reply. On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:23:56AM +0100, Schalk W. Cronjé wrote: Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays. This is not possible: af_ZA has no clause while en_ZA has has the same problematic text as en_BW and en_ZW. The no clause text can be interpreted to be the same license as (e)glibc, but if possible an concrete license would be preferable, so either LGPL v 2.1 or later or maybe same license than (e)glibc. I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales subsequently. Thanks. I was going to mail him later for his locales. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: be_BY This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: be_BY@latin This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: br_FR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: bg_BG This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: bs_BA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
- Original Message - From: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: bs_BA [snip] Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? Helge, I suspect that the only reason that this file references me as a contact is since it was based off Croatian locale that I put together two decades ago. I no longer maintain Croatian locale, but since this one is based off my work that was LGPLd, I believe the same license should apply to it, granting rights for use, distribution and modification according to LGPL. I hope this helps. Please let me know if there's anything else I'd need to do. Regards, -- Tomislav VujecManager, RHU Technical College Red Hat 1801 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA p: +1 919 754 4250 f: +1 919 754 3705 c: +1 919 223 6188 Google/Skype/AIM/Yahoo/IRC: tvujec http://www.redhat.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ede97509-7ebf-4afa-8874-8685c3fe3...@zmail16.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
Re: Bug#672152: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: dist/threads-shared/t/waithires.t failing
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:16:24AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 29/05/12 18:00, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 08:00:48PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 27/05/12 17:55, Steven Chamberlain wrote: I just checked to see if Petr's eglibc getosreldate() fix made any difference to the Perl waithires.t test [...] Actually this is fixed (#673711), I just didn't notice the other commit in pkg-glibc SVN. Thanks Petr! Thanks - I'd appreciate a heads-up when the updated package is available for test in sid. Hi Dominic, The new eglibc is installed in sid now. Hopefully that failing test can be re-enabled. (I'm running it now and it looks fixed to me). Thanks, confirmed here too and re-enabled in git. Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120608211727.gg5...@urchin.earth.li
