Bug#677624: multiarch-support should be priority: required

2012-06-15 Thread Ted Ts'o
Package: multiarch-support Version: 2.13-33 Forwarding per Russ's observation that multiple required library packages are depending on multiarch-support, which causes Lintian to complain. Given that it is a transitional package, this shouldn't be a big deal, since it's less than 200k installed

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: hsb_DE This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ht_HT This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: hu_HU This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: hy_AM This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed