Re: Bug#678511: zlib: FTBFS on s390x

2012-06-22 Thread Mark Brown
reassign 678511 libc6-dev kthxbye On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:12:25PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Your package FTBFS on s390x. s390x is now a release architecture [1], hence the RC status. Please make *some* effort to read the buildd logs when reporting bugs like this. If you'd looked

Processed: Re: Bug#678511: zlib: FTBFS on s390x

2012-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 678511 libc6-dev Bug #678511 [zlib] zlib: FTBFS on s390x Bug reassigned from package 'zlib' to 'libc6-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions 1:1.2.7.dfsg-12. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #678511 to the same values

Processed: tagging 678511

2012-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 678511 + sid wheezy Bug #678511 [libc6-dev] zlib: FTBFS on s390x Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678511

Re: Bug#678511: zlib: FTBFS on s390x

2012-06-22 Thread Sven Joachim
reassign 678511 src:zlib 1:1.2.7.dfsg-3 thanks On 2012-06-22 14:02 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: reassign 678511 libc6-dev kthxbye On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:12:25PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Your package FTBFS on s390x. s390x is now a release architecture [1], hence the RC status.

Processed: Re: Bug#678511: zlib: FTBFS on s390x

2012-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 678511 src:zlib 1:1.2.7.dfsg-3 Bug #678511 [libc6-dev] zlib: FTBFS on s390x Bug reassigned from package 'libc6-dev' to 'src:zlib'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #678511 to the same values previously set Ignoring request

r5289 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/hurd-i386

2012-06-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Author: sthibault Date: 2012-06-22 18:22:54 + (Fri, 22 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5289 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/submitted-AF_LINK.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series.hurd-i386 Log: New hurd-only patch

r5290 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/hurd-i386

2012-06-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Author: sthibault Date: 2012-06-22 19:19:48 + (Fri, 22 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5290 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/unsubmitted-mremap.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series.hurd-i386 Log: New hurd-only patch

Processed: reassign 678358 to libc0.3, affects 678358

2012-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 678358 libc0.3 eglibc/2.13-33 Bug #678358 [hurd] hurd should not define AF_LINK . Bug reassigned from package 'hurd' to 'libc0.3'. No longer marked as found in versions hurd/20120605-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Processed: tagging 678358

2012-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 678358 + pending Bug #678358 [libc0.3] hurd should not define AF_LINK . Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678358

Processed: tagging 678358

2012-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 678358 + pending Bug #678358 [libc0.3] hurd should not define AF_LINK . Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #678358 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678358:

r5291 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

2012-06-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Author: sthibault Date: 2012-06-22 20:14:34 + (Fri, 22 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5291 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: close bug Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 Carlos O'Donell carlos_odonell at mentor dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread jrnieder at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2012-06-22 21:23:20 UTC --- Based on experience from the sinking feeling of watching target milestones slowly march forward on the Mozilla and Chromium bugtrackers: could you target

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #11 from Carlos O'Donell carlos_odonell at mentor dot com 2012-06-22 22:08:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Based on experience from the sinking feeling of watching target milestones slowly march forward on the Mozilla and

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #12 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2012-06-22 22:20:23 UTC --- Fixing this bug should not be complex or invasive. Basically, it's a case of special-case code having been incorrectly written for a case that does not need

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #13 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2012-06-23 00:54:03 UTC --- Created attachment 6472 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6472 patch to fix the bug This patch fixes the bug. As I suspected, it's all

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #15 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2012-06-23 03:04:11 UTC --- The bug has nothing to do with wprintf. It applies to the non-wide printf functions. The text you cited is about wprintf and is therefore irrelevant. --

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread jrnieder at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2012-06-23 03:19:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) The bug has nothing to do with wprintf. It applies to the non-wide printf functions. The text you cited is about wprintf and

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #17 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2012-06-23 03:30:16 UTC --- Apologies for jumping on your reply. I did read the whole thing but didn't get what you intended the message to be, and the whole history of this bug has been