Hi, As it was suggested in the bugreport, most of those locales were copied from one common example and nobody could imagine that it would ever be necessary to license this data properly in the future... Anyway, I'm fine with re-licensing ru_UA under LGPLv2.1+
-- Denys On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello, > you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: > > ru_UA > > This locale comes with a statement > > % Distribution and use is free, also > % for commercial purposes. > > Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this > statement was meant as a license. > > As discussed in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this > locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a > great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). > > To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following > question: > > Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, > e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? > > If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to > contact me (via the reply-to address set). > > Thanks for helping to resolve this! > > Helge > > -- > Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de > Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php > 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred > Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ > > > -- > Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de > Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php > 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred > Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120706060755.gd3...@denix.org
