Author: sthibault
Date: 2013-06-11 02:26:23 + (Tue, 11 Jun 2013)
New Revision: 5628
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/libpthread_ctypes.diff
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/submitted-handle-eprototype.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 711913 libc6/2.16-0experimental0
Bug #711913 [libc6] libc6: ld.so falsely claims the vDSO comes from a file
The source libc6 and version 2.16-0experimental0 do not appear to match any
binary packages
No longer marked as found in versions
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> With Drepper gone, upstream is now interested in a fix, but say they
> aren't likely to get to it anytime soon themselves, and seem to want
> something at least slightly more involved than what Redhat has.
>
> (In particular, they seem to wa
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13097
Bug #711913 [libc6] libc6: ld.so falsely claims the vDSO comes from a file
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13097'.
> affects -1 + gdb
Bug #711913 [libc6
Package: libc6
Version: 2.17-4
Severity: normal
Control: forwarded -1 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13097
Control: affects -1 + gdb
Control: found -1 libc6/2.16-0experimental0
Dear Maintainer,
I recently noticed the behaviour in gdb complained of in the below
upstream bug report
5 matches
Mail list logo