Author: sthibault
Date: 2015-11-25 02:25:18 + (Wed, 25 Nov 2015)
New Revision: 6705
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/sysdeps/hurd-i386.mk
Log:
* sysdeps/hurd-i386.mk: Disable libc0.3-i686 and libc0.3-xen build for now
Author: sthibault
Date: 2015-11-25 02:01:28 + (Wed, 25 Nov 2015)
New Revision: 6704
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/patches/hurd-i386/cvs-hidden.diff
Log:
Add missing file
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/patches/hurd-i386/cvs-hidden.diff
=
Author: sthibault
Date: 2015-11-25 01:56:42 + (Wed, 25 Nov 2015)
New Revision: 6703
Added:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/patches/hurd-i386/cvs-hidden.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/patches/hurd-i38
Author: sthibault
Date: 2015-11-25 00:42:57 + (Wed, 25 Nov 2015)
New Revision: 6702
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/patches/hurd-i386/tg-context_functions.diff
Log:
* patches/hurd-i386/tg-context_functions.diff: Upd
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> You should copy out the test output file so it's possible to see which
> step of the mqueue5 test failed.
>
> There are some recent changes to the mqueue implementation in Linux
> that might possibly have caused this (not because they are known buggy,
>
Author: sthibault
Date: 2015-11-24 23:58:18 + (Tue, 24 Nov 2015)
New Revision: 6701
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.21/debian/patches/hurd-i386/tg-tls-threadvar.diff
Log:
* patches/hurd-i386/tg-tls-threadvar.diff: Update, to
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-08-17 15:04, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
>> wrote:
>> >> until there's a better tested and working way to transition
>> >> to ffmpeg?
>> >
>> > This really doesn't have that much to
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 17:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have backported the upstream patch for squeeze and it results in the
> attached patch. It does compile and I have not identified any regression
> but the build log mentions unexpected testsuite failures.
>
> Comparing with a
[ Cc the security team if they want to use it to prepare a DSA ]
Hello,
since the wheezy eglibc is relatively close to squeeze's version, I have
updated my former backport for wheezy as well.
Please find the patch attached. It does build but the resulting
package has not been tested and I did no
Hello,
I have backported the upstream patch for squeeze and it results in the
attached patch. It does compile and I have not identified any regression
but the build log mentions unexpected testsuite failures.
Comparing with a build of the the previous version, I get only one
supplementary failure
10 matches
Mail list logo
