Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 05:41:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is > > > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don

Re: Bug#842796: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:04:39AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Henrique de Moraes Holschuh] > > And what should we do about Debian stretch, then? > > I believe a good start would be to add an assert() in a test version of > glibc and then run all the autopkgtest scripts on the packages in

[glibc] branch sid updated (fd76a49 -> ee6ffab)

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. aurel32 pushed a change to branch sid in repository glibc. from fd76a49 hurd: Restore march version _pthread_spin_lock new ee6ffab debian/patches/git-updates.diff: update from upstream stable branch: The 1 rev

Processed: Bug#841304 marked as pending

2016-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 841304 pending Bug #841304 [glibc] invalid code in glibc tests Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 841304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841304 Debian Bug T

[glibc] 01/01: debian/patches/git-updates.diff: update from upstream stable branch:

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. aurel32 pushed a commit to branch sid in repository glibc. commit ee6ffabef0baa307624c273367706d1bc261770e Author: Aurelien Jarno Date: Sun Nov 6 22:08:07 2016 +0100 debian/patches/git-updates.diff: update from upstream st

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-11-06 01:12, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 05 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Looking at the code, I think that gs in jessie is plainly violating > > the rules about the use of pthread locks. On my partner's machine, > > Per logs from message #15 on bug #842796: > https://

Re: Bug#842796: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Jeff Epler] > I believe that similar bugs have been afflicting hurd and kfreebsd > debian ports for some time. In retrospect, it's too bad these reports > weren't given more attention, because it could have made things better > for Linux platforms as well. :-/ Yeah, too bad. :/ On the other ha

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 05:41:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is > > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don't know whether > > glibc avoids using it on the

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Ian Jackson
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?"): > Per logs from message #15 on bug #842796: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842796#15 > > SIGSEGV on __lll_unlock_elision is a signature (IME with very high > confidence)

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote: > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don't know whether > glibc avoids using it on these processors if the microcode update is > not applied. (Linux doesn't appear to hid

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Jeff Epler
[resending with correct Cc:] I believe that similar bugs have been afflicting hurd and kfreebsd debian ports for some time. In retrospect, it's too bad these reports weren't given more attention, because it could have made things better for Linux platforms as well. :-/ see e.g., https://bugs.deb

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 20:32 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 11/05/2016 08:13 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I have just been debugging a ghostscript segfault on jessie amd64. > > > > Looking at the code, I think that gs in jessie is plainly violating > > the rules about the use of pthread locks.  

[tzdata] 01/03: New upstream version

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. aurel32 pushed a commit to branch wheezy in repository tzdata. commit eb649b86267bdbfc03e37fc86b8c34e05dcc7203 Author: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Date: Sun Nov 6 11:11:17 2016 +0100 New upstream version New upstream v

[tzdata] 03/03: Release to wheezy-security

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. aurel32 pushed a commit to branch wheezy in repository tzdata. commit 4b55a9ab023aaa129bcbfb0e47e0773b19dfe02b Author: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Date: Sun Nov 6 11:12:30 2016 +0100 Release to wheezy-security --- debian/chang

[tzdata] branch wheezy updated (71c268e -> 4b55a9a)

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. aurel32 pushed a change to branch wheezy in repository tzdata. from 71c268e Release to wheezy-security new eb649b8 New upstream version new 514d42f Update templates and translations. new 4b55a9

[tzdata] 02/03: Update templates and translations.

2016-11-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. aurel32 pushed a commit to branch wheezy in repository tzdata. commit 514d42f50d22fcfd7c9fa3d962cfebe1093aa303 Author: Aurelien Jarno Date: Sat Nov 5 23:44:36 2016 +0100 Update templates and translations. --- debian/chang

[glibc] branch sid updated (a5a376f -> fd76a49)

2016-11-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sthibault pushed a change to branch sid in repository glibc. from a5a376f hurd: Drop spurious pthread_spin_lock aliases new fd76a49 hurd: Restore march version _pthread_spin_lock The 1 revisions listed above as

[glibc] 01/01: hurd: Restore march version _pthread_spin_lock

2016-11-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sthibault pushed a commit to branch sid in repository glibc. commit fd76a49313eb7dbe51a86304e067be5913c0b190 Author: Samuel Thibault Date: Sun Nov 6 13:39:07 2016 +0100 hurd: Restore march version _pthread_spin_lock

Re: Bug#842796: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh] > And what should we do about Debian stretch, then? I believe a good start would be to add an assert() in a test version of glibc and then run all the autopkgtest scripts on the packages in the archive to see how widespread the problem is. It will not cover all packa