Hello, Carlos
07.08.19 16:54, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:12 AM Roman Savochenko
mailto:romansavoche...@gmail.com>> wrote:
So, we have got such regression, and I have to think about
back-using Debian 7 on such sort dynamic environments and forget
all new ones.
Hello, Florian
07.08.19 17:04, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Roman Savochenko:
Initial condition of the problem representing is a program in the
single source code, built on-and for Debian 7, 8, 9, 10 with a result
in the Live disks.
I think glibc 2.13 as shipped by Debian was not built with
--enabl
* Roman Savochenko:
> Initial condition of the problem representing is a program in the
> single source code, built on-and for Debian 7, 8, 9, 10 with a result
> in the Live disks.
I think glibc 2.13 as shipped by Debian was not built with
--enable-experimental-malloc, so it doesn't use arenas.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:12 AM Roman Savochenko
wrote:
> So, we have got such regression, and I have to think about back-using
> Debian 7 on such sort dynamic environments and forget all new ones. :(
>
The primary thing to determine is if this extra memory is due to
application demand or not.
T
4 matches
Mail list logo