Package: libc6-dev-amd64-cross
Version: 2.39-4cross1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
while trying to cross-build the next upload of my source package pico-sdk for
amd64 on my arm64 box in a clean unstable chroot with sbuild, I ran into the
following problem:
Ins
Hi,
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2024-05-20 11:49:32)
> > > > That's all legacy stuff and I really don't want to touch it anymore.
> > > > Going from the other side, maybe libc6.postinst could use something
> > > > more reliable than ischroot()? Is systemd-detect-virt able to figure
> > > > out the sit
Hi,
Quoting Chris Hofstaedtler (2024-05-20 10:38:04)
> * Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues [240520 07:35]:
> > [..] But maybe it [glibc's postinst] should be doing some
> > more involved checks about what PID 1 is? It could then make sure to only
> > call
> > sys
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2024-05-20 07:17:54)
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 01:02:32AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > "..., when using telinit from systemd-sysv"
> >
> > It would seem like a reasonable assumption that systemd-sysv's
> > telinit uses systemd-specific stuff, like SIGT
Source: glibc
Version: 2.37-15
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
one of the reasons for DPKG_ROOT support in packages close to the essential and
build-essential set is to bui
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2022-10-11 22:14:31)
> From what I have understood from your explanation, if the directory exists
> chroot_canon() will work, so `ldconfig -r` will be able to create the
> aux-cache file in it.
I can confirm this conclusion. The following patch makes our CI pass without
any
Hi,
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2022-10-11 21:55:47)
> Ok, thanks for the details, I'll look at the patch.
thank you!
> Anyway that makes me wonder if we should ship that directory in the libc6
> package, just like apt ships /var/cache/apt and debconf ships
> /var/cache/debconf.
In our DPKG_ROOT CI
Hi,
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2022-10-11 21:41:05)
> On 2022-10-11 07:57, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> > Package: glibc
> > Version: 2.35-3
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > when running libc-bin.postinst with
Package: glibc
Version: 2.35-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
when running libc-bin.postinst with DPKG_ROOT non-empty, ldconfig from
the outside is used to operate on the chroot and thus ldconfig will
never create the empty /var/cache/ldconfig directory inside the chroot.
Please consider creat
Source: glibc
Version: 2.34-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + fakechroot mmdebstrap
Hi,
ultimately this probably needs to be fixed in fakechroot but I need some
help solving this problem from somebody who understands glibc.
Since the upload of glibc 2.34, ge
Source: tzdata
Version: 2021e-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-root-support
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Hi,
when creating chroots for new architectures that are in the process of
being bootstrapped without yet having emulation support from qemu,
Source: glibc
Version: 2.33-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-root-support
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Hi,
when glibc is installed with $DPKG_ROOT set to a non-empty string, then
"systemctl daemon-reexec" or "telinit" should not be executed, simil
rg/glibc-team/glibc/-/merge_requests/4
And attached the git-format-patch.
Thanks!
cheers, josch>From 64e9212385a7cf75a206481e539ca1779a075b5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:37:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] More support for DPKG_ROOT (closes: #9834
Okay, wow, this is a 100 times better solution than the one I proposed. :D
Thank you!!
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2020-03-24 19:02:59)
> Bug #954374 in glibc reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi again,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2020-03-21 22:50:46)
> Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2020-03-21 00:00:18)
> > On 2020-03-20 22:57, Johannes 'josch' Schauer wrote:
> > > would it be possible to make the libc6 preinst maintainer script
> > &g
Hi,
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (2020-03-21 00:00:18)
> On 2020-03-20 22:57, Johannes 'josch' Schauer wrote:
> > would it be possible to make the libc6 preinst maintainer script
> > compatible with busybox? Currently the preinst script calls "readlink
> > -m" which is not supported by busybox. Hence th
-2.19/debian/changelog 2014-09-12 23:50:53.0 +0200
+++ glibc-2.19/debian/changelog 2014-10-06 15:33:31.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+glibc (2.19-11.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Make Build-Profiles field comply with the spec
+
+ -- Johannes Schauer Mo
Package: tzdata
Version: 2011h-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
this problem was present since 2011h-1 and while I can install tzdata
again since bug #631878 is fixed, I still get the exact same error as
described in that bug report when using debconf-set-selections before
package installation:
Setting up
Hi,
I can confirm that the same happens with a multistrap installation.
tzdata cannot be configured:
$> fakeroot fakechroot chroot debian-sid-armel-2011-06-30 dpkg --configure
tzdata
Setting up tzdata (2011h-2) ...
dpkg: error processing tzdata (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installat
19 matches
Mail list logo
