Package: libc6
Version: 2.31-4
Severity: important
Hello GNU libc maintainers,
There is a circular dependency between libc6, debconf, dpkg, libacl1,
libbz2-1.0, libcom-err2, libcrypt1, libgcc-s1, libgssapi-krb5-2,
libk5crypto3, libkeyutils1, libkrb5-3, libkrb5support0, liblzma5,
libnsl2,
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 04:50:22PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 02:34:04PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 1.5.50
Severity: important
Hello libc6 maintainers,
There is a circular Pre-Depends loop between debconf, dpkg, libbz2-1.0
Package: libc6
Version: 1.5.50
Severity: important
Hello libc6 maintainers,
There is a circular Pre-Depends loop between debconf, dpkg, libbz2-1.0, libc6,
libgcc1, liblzma5, libpcre3, libselinux1, multiarch-support, perl-base, tar and
zlib1g:
One is due to the dependency on debconf and the
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 12:37:07AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Aurelien Jarno, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 19:16:40 +0200, a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Roger Leigh, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0100, a écrit :
There were no objections to having a
Package: libc6
Version: 2.10.2-8
Severity: serious
Hello GNU Libc Maintainers,
libc6 now Depends on debconf. This creates a circular (pre)-dependency hell.
You can see it at http://debian.semistable.com/dot/zlib1g_unstable.png
Specifically: (-: Depends, =: Pre-Depends)
libc6 - debconf =
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.10.2-6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello GNU Libc Maintainers,
When using gcc 2.95, gcc report a warning:
%gcc-2.95 -Wno-main foo.c -c
In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:270,
from /usr/include/stdlib.h:320,
from
Package: libc6
Version: 2.10.2-3
Hello Debian libc maintainers,
I run a sid chroot on top of etch, using the etch kernel linux 2.6.18-6-686,
and dpkg started to fail with
tar: ./preinst: Cannot utime: Bad file descriptor
touch also fails:
%mkdir /tmp/bar
%touch /tmp/bar
touch: setting times of
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-6
Severity: important
Hello Debian GLIBC maintainers,
popen is broken on some systems, though details are scare,
it seems it affect some amd64 with libc6 version 2.9-6 and
kernel 2.6.26-1-amd64.
The following menu bugs are related to this problem:
#520989
#520916
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:36:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-6
Severity: important
Hello Debian GLIBC maintainers,
popen is broken on some systems, though details are scare,
it seems it affect some amd64 with libc6 version 2.9-6 and
kernel 2.6.26-1-amd64
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:41:26PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:36:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-6
Severity: important
Hello Debian GLIBC maintainers,
popen is broken on some systems, though details are scare,
it seems
found 378191 2.5-3
quit
Hello GNU Libc Maintainers,
locales-all still include the file
/usr/share/doc/locales-all/README.Debian
which was supposed to be removed in version 2.3.6-16
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.6.18-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Break sarge to etch upgrade
Hello GLibc maintainers,
There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch,
it should Replaces amd64-libs-dev:
Preparing to replace linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6-3
Severity: normal
Dear Debian GLibc maintainers,
info libc does not seem to document the behaviour of ld.so.
man ld.so is old and does not mention new files like
/etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.nohwcap.
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi,
This is a followup for Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/279722.
I already tried in the past to build glibc on my system, and this was
too long a task for my laptop, could someone try swapping the free
after the
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 12:43:36PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Invalid read is not a memory leak - this says something has been
freed and then used. It looks like the destructors are running in the
wrong order, maybe.
We'd still need a testcase.
A somewhat crappy testcase:
$ apt-get
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:18:40AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Oct-24 23:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:18:15PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
This patch is harmless with respect to any LSB requirement.
The name of the dynamic loader, which is coded into
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Does your binaries run on other x86-64 distributions without any compat
symlinks ? I think this is an absolute requirement for pure64.
The binaries will run on all distributions which have
the interpreter accessible as
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:37:21AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: fenris
Severity: serious
Version: 1:0.07build3244-2.1
From my build log:
...
[+] Version (build): 0.07-m (3244)
[*] Overriding sanity checks! Yuppi!
[+] Operating system check: Linux (supported)
[+] Processor
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:37:21AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: fenris
Severity: serious
Version: 1:0.07build3244-2.1
From my build log:
...
[+] Version (build): 0.07-m (3244)
[*] Overriding sanity checks! Yuppi!
[+] Operating system check: Linux (supported)
[+] Processor
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: minor
Hello, Debian GLibc maintainers,
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-osinfo.h read:
#define DL_SYSDEP_OSCHECK(FATAL) \
do {\
/* Test whether the kernel is new enough.
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: minor
Hello, Debian GLibc maintainers,
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-osinfo.h read:
#define DL_SYSDEP_OSCHECK(FATAL) \
do {\
/* Test whether the kernel is new enough.
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
Severity: normal
Dear Glibc maintainers,
Since a few days, the following program
---test.c
#include signal.h
-
give:
$ gcc-2.95 -c -Wall test.c 21
In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4,
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: important
Hello Debian glibc maintainers,
This bug is basically a reopen of #174253 which has been closed
a bit hastily and is archived now.
--- How to reproduce the problem:
Set up fr_FR ISO-8859-1 in locales.gen
Use the Debian provided locale.alias
23 matches
Mail list logo
