Source: glibc
Version: 2.30-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
> UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-ldconfig-bad-aux-cache
> UNSUPPORTED:
On 27/03/19 at 23:59 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> retitle 924891 glibc: misc/tst-pkey fails due to cleared PKRU register after
> signal in amd64 32-bit compat mode
> thanks
>
> * Lucas Nussbaum:
>
> > On 27/03/19 at 08:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>
On 27/03/19 at 22:00 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/03/19 at 08:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > If that's useful, I can easily provide access to an AWS VM to debug this
> > > issue.
> >
> > Oh, that would be quite helpful indeed.
>
>
On 27/03/19 at 08:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > If that's useful, I can easily provide access to an AWS VM to debug this
> > issue.
>
> Oh, that would be quite helpful indeed.
Can you send your SSH key? (I thought there was a way to get the SSH key
for a DD, but I cannot find it anymore)
On 26/03/19 at 23:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2019-03-22 17:30, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> > > Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> > > failed build was retried once to
On 22/03/19 at 17:30 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> > Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> > failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
>
> I believe the actual test
Package: libc6
Version: 2.24-11+deb9u3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When I use 'xl create' or 'xl destroy' to manage Xen domUs, xl segfaults
with:
(gdb) run create /etc/xen/domU.cfg
Starting program: /usr/lib/xen-4.8/bin/xl create /etc/xen/domU.cfg
[Thread debugging using libthread_db
On 12/11/16 at 18:51 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Lucas,
>
> Thanks for trying a build run with TSX enabled.
>
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I did an archive rebuild on Amazon EC2 using m4.16xlarge instances, that
> > use a CPU
On 07/11/16 at 21:52 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/11/16 at 17:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> > > supposed to b
Source: glibc
Version: 2.24-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2016 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
> UNRESOLVED: argp/argp-test
> UNRESOLVED:
On 07/11/16 at 21:52 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/11/16 at 17:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> > > supposed to b
Hi,
On 06/11/16 at 17:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don't know whether
> > glibc avoids using it on these
.eglibc/
Some of them are likely to be false positive caused by something else
(random failures, etc).
Conclusion: it doesn't seem like we will get a ton of glibc-related
FTBFS like the getline ones.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu
).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
DEBIAN_FRONTEND is a PITA when doing
non-interactive upgrades.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
15 matches
Mail list logo
