Bug#636286: tagging 636286

2012-01-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… thanks for doing so silently and with no reason. Maybe I should indeed, as you expressed so nicely, stop to care

Bug#636286: tagging 636286

2012-01-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Thorsten Glaser wrote: Aurelien Jarno dixit: tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… The wontfix tag has a somewhat complicated role. In practice, it generally means that

Bug#636286: tagging 636286

2012-01-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:35:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Aurelien Jarno dixit: tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… This has only be seen so far on m68k. I