Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2020-03-13 17:22:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The reason is that all *-dbgsym packages need to go the debug archive, > not the main archive. Thanks, this is the piece of information that i was missing. Where is it documented that all *-dbgsym packages need to go to the debug archive?

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-03-13 11:36, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2020-03-12 23:21:29 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > That would clearly work for your use case. Now I am not sure it won't > > break other things. > > I'd like to know what it would break if it would break anything. Anything that take a

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2020-03-12 23:21:29 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > That would clearly work for your use case. Now I am not sure it won't > break other things. I'd like to know what it would break if it would break anything. > I asked on IRC and so far only get the confirmation that the package > shall

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-03-11 20:31, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2020-03-11 21:42:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 > >> seems to be the exception. > > > > Well libc6-dbg is not a standard dbgsym package: > > - It is a dependency

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2020-03-11 21:42:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 >> seems to be the exception. > > Well libc6-dbg is not a standard dbgsym package: > - It is a dependency for other packages > - It is a build-dependency for other

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-03-11 15:33, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: libc6-dbg > Version: 2.29-10 > > Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 > seems to be the exception. Well libc6-dbg is not a standard dbgsym package: - It is a dependency for other packages - It is a

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: libc6-dbg Version: 2.29-10 Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 seems to be the exception. Can we please rename this package (along with a transitional package to help folks upgrade from libc6-dbg) and set up an appropriate Provides: at least? This