Hi,
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > i would try to see why /etc is not created in the testroot.
> Maybe it was only previously created as part of installing /etc/rpc there
> and the patch is causing that file no longer to be installed?
Found that. That was the missing piece.
Hi Szabolcs, Joseph,
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > i would try to see why /etc is not created in the testroot.
> Maybe it was only previously created as part of installing /etc/rpc there
> and the patch is causing that file no longer to be installed?
Thanks for your tips!
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> i would try to see why /etc is not created in the testroot.
Maybe it was only previously created as part of installing /etc/rpc there
and the patch is causing that file no longer to be installed?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
* Petr Vorel [2020-06-05 18:53:53 +0200]:
> $ strace -o logfile -f -s 222 -tt make test
> t=elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update
> original exit status 1
> error: xfopen.c:29: could not open /etc/ld.so.conf (mode "a+"): No such file
> or directory
> error: 1 test failures
> running post-clean
* Petr Vorel:
>> I'm still having issues with elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update when
>> running with both commits (it's ok when running only first commit).
>
> OK, I noticed core dump (can be reproduced):
> systemd-coredump[26018]: Process 26016 (ld-linux-x86-64) of user 1000 dumped
> core.
>
>
> Hi,
> I'm still having issues with elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update when
> running with both commits (it's ok when running only first commit).
OK, I noticed core dump (can be reproduced):
systemd-coredump[26018]: Process 26016 (ld-linux-x86-64) of user 1000 dumped
core.
PID:
Hi,
I'm still having issues with elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update when
running with both commits (it's ok when running only first commit).
$ ../glibc/configure --prefix=/usr
$ make -j`nproc`
$ make -j`nproc` check
1 FAIL
4165 PASS
24 UNSUPPORTED
12 XFAIL
6 XPASS
FAIL:
7 matches
Mail list logo
