Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread xiphmont
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tags 214694 + unreproducible thanks unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Phil Edwards
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote: I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had removed/moved them). I'd have

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread xiphmont
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: reassign 214692 g++-3.3 reassign 214694 g++-3.3 severity 214692 normal severity 214694 normal merge 214692 214694 retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2) thanks ...is there any way to cause a gcc

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 214692 g++-3.3 reassign 214694 g++-3.3 severity 214692 normal severity 214694 normal merge 214692 214694 retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2) thanks xiphmont writes: On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tags 214694 +

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread xiphmont
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: reassign 214692 g++-3.3 reassign 214694 g++-3.3 severity 214692 normal severity 214694 normal merge 214692 214694 retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2) thanks ...is there any way to cause a gcc

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 214692 g++-3.3 reassign 214694 g++-3.3 severity 214692 normal severity 214694 normal merge 214692 214694 retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2) thanks xiphmont writes: On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tags 214694 +

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-07 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 214694 + unreproducible thanks unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? xiphmont writes: Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable I apologize for originally filing this against libc6-dev; I see this

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-07 Thread xiphmont
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tags 214694 + unreproducible thanks unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-07 Thread Phil Edwards
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote: I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had removed/moved them). I'd have