On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 214694 + unreproducible
thanks
unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h?
I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew
problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote:
I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew
problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the
problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had
removed/moved them). I'd have
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 214692 g++-3.3
reassign 214694 g++-3.3
severity 214692 normal
severity 214694 normal
merge 214692 214694
retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2)
thanks
...is there any way to cause a gcc
reassign 214692 g++-3.3
reassign 214694 g++-3.3
severity 214692 normal
severity 214694 normal
merge 214692 214694
retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2)
thanks
xiphmont writes:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 214694 +
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 214692 g++-3.3
reassign 214694 g++-3.3
severity 214692 normal
severity 214694 normal
merge 214692 214694
retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2)
thanks
...is there any way to cause a gcc
reassign 214692 g++-3.3
reassign 214694 g++-3.3
severity 214692 normal
severity 214694 normal
merge 214692 214694
retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (= 3.3.2)
thanks
xiphmont writes:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 214694 +
tags 214694 + unreproducible
thanks
unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h?
xiphmont writes:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
I apologize for originally filing this against libc6-dev; I see
this
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 214694 + unreproducible
thanks
unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h?
I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew
problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote:
I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew
problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the
problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had
removed/moved them). I'd have
9 matches
Mail list logo