On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:18:40AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Oct-24 23:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:18:15PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
This patch is harmless with respect to any LSB requirement.
The name of the dynamic loader, which is coded into
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Does your binaries run on other x86-64 distributions without any compat
symlinks ? I think this is an absolute requirement for pure64.
The binaries will run on all distributions which have
the interpreter accessible as
On 04-Oct-30 16:55, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Anyway, if you intend to run binaries on different distributions,
you should create binaries which conform to the LSB standard and you
should install the LSB compatibility package on
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 09:52:11PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
+--- ldconfig.h 2002-04-22 11:51:40.0 +
glibc-2.3.2/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/ldconfig.h2004-10-07
14:47:52.649686928 +
+@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
+
+ #define SYSDEP_KNOWN_INTERPRETER_NAMES \
+
Kurt,
thanks for looking at my bug report (and for looking through so
many failed packages on pure64 during the last few days!).
On 04-Oct-24 15:55, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Atleast part of the patch looks totaly wrong to me. Please do
not change the location of the dynamic loader. This is LSB
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:18:15PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
This patch is harmless with respect to any LSB requirement.
The name of the dynamic loader, which is coded into every binary
can only be changed in the gcc package. This patch does not change
that.
I don't know what you all
Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The attached patch changes the remaining two instances of 'lib64' to 'lib'
on amd64 by patching the files 'sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/ldconfig.h'
and 'sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/ldd-rewrite.sed'.
The two patches are appended to the
7 matches
Mail list logo
